HEGD vs. HOLA
HEGD (Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF) and HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. HEGD is passively managed, while HOLA is actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEGD charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HOLA.
Performance
HEGD vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEGD achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than HOLA's 4.14% return.
HEGD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- —
HOLA
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEGD vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | 7.52% | 7.11% |
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 4.14% | 7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEGD and HOLA is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.67 |
HEGD vs. HOLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEGD
HOLA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HEGD
HOLA
Financial Services
HEGD
HOLA
Communication Services
HEGD
HOLA
Consumer Cyclical
HEGD
HOLA
Healthcare
HEGD
HOLA
Industrials
HEGD
HOLA
Consumer Defensive
HEGD
HOLA
Energy
HEGD
HOLA
Utilities
HEGD
HOLA
Real Estate
HEGD
HOLA
Basic Materials
HEGD
HOLA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEGD vs. HOLA — Risk / Return Rank
HEGD
HOLA
HEGD vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEGD | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.49 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEGD | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.44 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
HEGD vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEGD drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, which is greater than HOLA's maximum drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEGD and HOLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEGD | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.56% | -6.99% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.69% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -1.45% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | — | — |
Volatility
HEGD vs. HOLA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEGD | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.92% | 9.52% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.40% | 9.52% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.35% | 9.52% | -0.17% |
HEGD vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEGD has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEGD vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison
HEGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than HOLA's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.39% | 0.87% | 0.31% |
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.90% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEGD and HOLA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for HEGD.
HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.33% for HEGD.
They also come from different issuers: Swan and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for HEGD and 0.50% for HOLA.
Find the right allocation for HEGD and HOLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer