HEGD vs. HOLA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA).

HEGD and HOLA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEGD is a passively managed fund by Swan that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 22, 2020. HOLA is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Mar 15, 2019.

Performance

HEGD vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HEGD vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF	-1.73%	7.11%
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	1.19%	7.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEGD achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than HOLA's 1.19% return.

HEGD

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -2.38%
• YTD: -1.73%
• 6M: -0.47%
• 1Y: 13.14%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 7.98%
• 10Y*: —

HOLA

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -2.74%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 5.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEGD vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEGD has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.

HEGD

Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF

HOLA

JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF

Return for Risk

HEGD vs. HOLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEGD

HEGD Risk / Return Rank: 86
HEGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
HEGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HEGD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
HEGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HEGD Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEGD vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEGD	HOLA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.89	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEGD	HOLA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	1.35	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between HEGD and HOLA is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HEGD vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison

HEGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than HOLA's 2.99% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.43%	0.39%	0.87%	0.31%
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.99%	3.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HEGD vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEGD drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, which is greater than HOLA's maximum drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEGD and HOLA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEGD	HOLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.56%	-6.99%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.15%	-4.48%	+1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-1.18%	-2.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HEGD	HOLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.93%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.00%	9.30%	-1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.41%	9.30%	+0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.40%	9.30%	+0.10%