HEGD vs. HEQQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HEGD (Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF) and HEQQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEGD is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the S&P 500, while HEQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by JPMorgan. Over the past year, HEGD returned 18.32% vs 16.57% for HEQQ. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEGD charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HEQQ.

Performance

HEGD vs. HEQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEGD achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly higher than HEQQ's 4.36% return.

HEGD

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 6M: 6.51%
• 1Y: 18.32%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: 9.09%
• 10Y*: —

HEQQ

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 4.36%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: 16.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEGD vs. HEQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF	7.10%	14.74%
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	4.36%	17.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HEGD and HEQQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.80

The correlation between HEGD and HEQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEGD vs. HEQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HEGD	HEQQ
Technology	36.1%	53.8%
Financial Services	11.8%	0.6%
Communication Services	11.0%	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.3%
Healthcare	8.4%	4.7%
Industrials	8.2%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	6.9%
Energy	3.5%	0.7%
Utilities	2.3%	1.8%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.2%
Basic Materials	1.8%	0.7%

Return for Risk

HEGD vs. HEQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEGD

HEGD Risk / Return Rank: 83
HEGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
HEGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
HEGD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
HEGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HEGD Martin Ratio Rank: 83

HEQQ

HEQQ Risk / Return Rank: 57
HEQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
HEQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
HEQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
HEQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
HEQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEGD vs. HEQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEGD	HEQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.04	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	2.87	+0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.39	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.20	2.18	+2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.65	8.59	+8.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HEGD vs. HEQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the HEQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEGD and HEQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEGD	HEQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	2.04	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	1.71	-0.64

Drawdowns

HEGD vs. HEQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEGD drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, which is greater than HEQQ's maximum drawdown of -7.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEGD and HEQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEGD	HEQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.56%	-7.64%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.39%	-7.64%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.84%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-1.11%	-2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	1.93%	-0.83%

Volatility

HEGD vs. HEQQ - Volatility Comparison

Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) at 1.33%. This indicates that HEGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEGD	HEQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.29%	1.33%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.95%	6.63%	-1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.94%	8.14%	-1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.40%	10.87%	-1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.35%	10.87%	-1.52%

HEGD vs. HEQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEGD has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQQ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEGD vs. HEQQ - Dividend Comparison

HEGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than HEQQ's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF	0.33%	0.36%	0.43%	0.39%	0.87%	0.31%
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.19%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEGD and HEQQ in my portfolio?

HEGD and HEQQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HEGD or HEQQ?

HEGD has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to HEQQ (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEGD dropped -14.56% vs HEQQ's -7.64%.

Which ETF is better, HEGD or HEQQ?

On 1-year performance, HEGD leads with 18.32% vs 16.57% for HEQQ. On fees, HEQQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HEQQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HEGD or HEQQ?

Over the 1-year period, HEGD has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 16.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEGD or HEQQ?

HEQQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for HEGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEGD or HEQQ?

HEGD has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.19% for HEQQ.

What is the main difference between HEGD and HEQQ?

HEGD is categorized as Equity Hedged, while HEQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Swan and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for HEGD and 0.50% for HEQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HEGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.