HEFT vs. NLSI
HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) and NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. HEFT charges 0.70%/yr vs 2.89%/yr for NLSI.
Performance
HEFT vs. NLSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFT achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than NLSI's 7.01% return.
HEFT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLSI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 10.92%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEFT vs. NLSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 7.91% | -0.77% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 7.01% | 1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFT and NLSI is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFT vs. NLSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEFT | NLSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 1.04 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
HEFT vs. NLSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFT drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum NLSI drawdown of -13.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFT and NLSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFT | NLSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -13.82% | +4.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -1.33% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -6.10% | +2.97% |
Volatility
HEFT vs. NLSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFT | NLSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 19.37% | -6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 19.37% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 19.37% | -6.84% |
HEFT vs. NLSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NLSI's 2.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEFT vs. NLSI - Dividend Comparison
HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than NLSI's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 2.42% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFT and NLSI have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEFT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEFT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.
NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.
They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HEFT and 2.89% for NLSI.
Find the right allocation for HEFT and NLSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer