HEFT vs. LMUB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) and LMUB (iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEFT is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while LMUB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free US Long National Municipal Index. HEFT is actively managed, while LMUB is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. HEFT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for LMUB.

Performance

HEFT vs. LMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEFT achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than LMUB's 2.42% return.

HEFT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LMUB

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 3.09%
• 1Y: 9.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEFT vs. LMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	7.87%	0.98%
LMUB iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF	2.42%	-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HEFT and LMUB is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

HEFT vs. LMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMUB

LMUB Risk / Return Rank: 68
LMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
LMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
LMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEFT vs. LMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEFT	LMUB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.83	+0.59

Drawdowns

HEFT vs. LMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEFT drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, which is greater than LMUB's maximum drawdown of -5.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFT and LMUB.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEFT	LMUB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	-5.51%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	0.00%	-2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.12%	-1.60%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HEFT	LMUB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.48%	4.21%	+8.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.48%	5.96%	+6.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.48%	5.96%	+6.52%

HEFT vs. LMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEFT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LMUB's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEFT vs. LMUB - Dividend Comparison

HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than LMUB's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	0.02%	0.02%
LMUB iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF	3.77%	3.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEFT and LMUB in my portfolio?

HEFT and LMUB have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HEFT or LMUB?

On fees, LMUB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEFT or LMUB?

LMUB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HEFT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEFT or LMUB?

LMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.

What is the main difference between HEFT and LMUB?

HEFT is categorized as Long-Short, while LMUB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HEFT and 0.09% for LMUB.