HEFT vs. BBRE
HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) and BBRE (JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEFT is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while BBRE is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index. HEFT is actively managed, while BBRE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. HEFT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BBRE.
Performance
HEFT vs. BBRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFT achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly lower than BBRE's 21.70% return.
HEFT
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBRE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- YTD
- 21.70%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- —
HEFT vs. BBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 3.52% | 1.10% |
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 21.70% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFT and BBRE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFT vs. BBRE — Risk / Return Rank
HEFT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBRE
HEFT vs. BBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEFT | BBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEFT vs. BBRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFT drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum BBRE drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFT and BBRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFT | BBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -43.61% | +34.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.60% | 0.00% | -6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.62% | -10.38% | +6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.54% | — |
Volatility
HEFT vs. BBRE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFT | BBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 14.20% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 18.85% | -5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 22.50% | -9.49% |
HEFT vs. BBRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BBRE's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEFT vs. BBRE - Dividend Comparison
HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BBRE's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 2.55% | 3.24% | 3.19% | 3.68% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 3.17% | 2.19% | 1.96% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFT and BBRE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HEFT.
BBRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.
HEFT is categorized as Long-Short, while BBRE is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HEFT and 0.11% for BBRE.
Find the right allocation for HEFT and BBRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer