HEFT vs. AAPW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) and AAPW (AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEFT is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while AAPW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. HEFT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AAPW.

Performance

HEFT vs. AAPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEFT achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than AAPW's 13.61% return.

HEFT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.42%
• 6M: -3.62%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AAPW

• 1D: -9.01%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 20.72%
• YTD: 13.61%
• 1Y: 58.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	$894.45K	$758.50K	$696.98K
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	$283.91K	$525.47K	$801.16K

HEFT vs. AAPW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	3.28%	1.10%
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	13.61%	2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between HEFT and AAPW is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

HEFT vs. AAPW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HEFT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAPW

AAPW Risk / Return Rank: 74
AAPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
AAPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
AAPW Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AAPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AAPW Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HEFT vs. AAPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HEFT	AAPW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.72	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.12	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.43	—

Drawdowns

HEFT vs. AAPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEFT drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum AAPW drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFT and AAPW.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEFT	AAPW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	-36.28%	+27.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.82%	-11.01%	+4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-10.44%	+6.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HEFT	AAPW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.66%	31.52%	-18.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.66%	35.68%	-23.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.66%	35.68%	-23.02%

HEFT vs. AAPW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEFT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEFT vs. AAPW - Dividend Comparison

HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than AAPW's 30.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	30.47%	28.83%
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	0.02%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEFT and AAPW in my portfolio?

HEFT and AAPW have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HEFT or AAPW?

On fees, HEFT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEFT or AAPW?

HEFT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AAPW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEFT or AAPW?

AAPW has the higher dividend yield at 30.47%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.

What is the main difference between HEFT and AAPW?

HEFT is categorized as Long-Short, while AAPW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HEFT and 0.99% for AAPW.