HEFT vs. AAPU
HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) and AAPU (Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - HEFT is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while AAPU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Apple Inc. (200%). HEFT is actively managed, while AAPU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. HEFT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for AAPU.
Performance
HEFT vs. AAPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFT achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly lower than AAPU's 26.11% return.
HEFT
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPU
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 17.04%
- 6M
- 38.03%
- YTD
- 26.11%
- 1Y
- 97.09%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEFT vs. AAPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 3.68% | 1.10% |
AAPU Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares | 26.11% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFT and AAPU is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFT vs. AAPU — Risk / Return Rank
HEFT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AAPU
HEFT vs. AAPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEFT | AAPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEFT vs. AAPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFT drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum AAPU drawdown of -58.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFT and AAPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFT | AAPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -58.61% | +49.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | -0.72% | -5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -17.49% | +13.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.57% | — |
Volatility
HEFT vs. AAPU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFT | AAPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 48.08% | -34.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 49.42% | -36.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 49.42% | -36.26% |
HEFT vs. AAPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPU's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEFT vs. AAPU - Dividend Comparison
HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than AAPU's 7.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPU Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares | 7.10% | 8.66% | 14.58% | 2.32% | 0.79% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFT and AAPU have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEFT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEFT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for AAPU.
AAPU has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.
HEFT is categorized as Long-Short, while AAPU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HEFT and 0.96% for AAPU.
Find the right allocation for HEFT and AAPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer