HEAL vs. JDOC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC).

HEAL and JDOC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEAL is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X HealthTech Index. It was launched on Jul 29, 2020. JDOC is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Nov 1, 2023.

Performance

HEAL vs. JDOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HEAL vs. JDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF	-18.45%	-0.62%	-2.87%	22.52%
JDOC Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF	-3.96%	15.36%	-1.04%	10.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEAL achieves a -18.45% return, which is significantly lower than JDOC's -3.96% return.

HEAL

• 1D: 2.83%
• 1M: -10.48%
• YTD: -18.45%
• 6M: -25.27%
• 1Y: -15.69%
• 3Y*: -12.07%
• 5Y*: -16.45%
• 10Y*: —

JDOC

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: -6.11%
• YTD: -3.96%
• 6M: 6.94%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEAL vs. JDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JDOC's 0.65% expense ratio.

JDOC

Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF

HEAL

Global X HealthTech ETF

Return for Risk

HEAL vs. JDOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEAL

HEAL Risk / Return Rank: 3
HEAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
HEAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HEAL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HEAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
HEAL Martin Ratio Rank: 2

JDOC

JDOC Risk / Return Rank: 21
JDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
JDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 19
JDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
JDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEAL vs. JDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEAL	JDOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	0.30	-0.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.81	0.54	-1.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.07	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	0.54	-1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.38	1.24	-2.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HEAL vs. JDOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the JDOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEAL and JDOC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEAL	JDOC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.64	0.30	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	0.59	-1.02

Correlation

The correlation between HEAL and JDOC is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HEAL vs. JDOC - Dividend Comparison

HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than JDOC's 0.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF	0.40%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%
JDOC Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF	0.92%	0.89%	5.57%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HEAL vs. JDOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than JDOC's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and JDOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEAL	JDOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.76%	-20.87%	-44.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.71%	-9.68%	-21.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.79%	-6.96%	-57.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.40%	-7.01%	-35.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.89%	4.61%	+6.28%

Volatility

HEAL vs. JDOC - Volatility Comparison

Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to Jpmorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF (JDOC) at 5.67%. This indicates that HEAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEAL	JDOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.53%	5.67%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.50%	10.15%	+6.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.65%	17.04%	+7.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.35%	14.33%	+12.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.33%	14.33%	+12.00%