HEAL vs. DTCR

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

HEAL (Global X HealthTech ETF) and DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEAL is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Global X HealthTech Index, while DTCR is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEAL returned -12.46%/yr vs 12.16%/yr for DTCR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

HEAL vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEAL achieves a -3.82% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 35.71% return.

HEAL

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 8.66%
• 6M: -7.84%
• YTD: -3.82%
• 1Y: -10.83%
• 3Y*: -7.80%
• 5Y*: -12.46%
• 10Y*: —

DTCR

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -8.10%
• 6M: 22.79%
• YTD: 35.71%
• 1Y: 54.36%
• 3Y*: 28.66%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEAL vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF	-3.82%	-0.62%	-2.87%	-12.61%	-29.99%	-14.21%	13.85%
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF	35.71%	28.99%	14.92%	18.93%	-30.89%	20.35%	6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HEAL and DTCR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020	0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between HEAL and DTCR has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HEAL vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEAL

HEAL Risk / Return Rank: 6
HEAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HEAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
HEAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
HEAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HEAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

DTCR

DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 83
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 80
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEAL vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HEAL	DTCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	2.29	-2.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	2.89	-3.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.37	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	4.24	-4.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.66	11.52	-12.18

HEAL vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEAL and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HEAL vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and DTCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEAL	DTCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.76%	-38.98%	-26.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.71%	-12.89%	-17.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.78%	-24.96%	-10.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.14%	-38.98%	-20.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.48%	-11.78%	-46.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.34%	-12.25%	-31.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.34%	4.73%	+11.61%

Volatility

HEAL vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) is 7.35%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that HEAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEAL	DTCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.35%	8.13%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.15%	19.11%	-1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.67%	23.88%	-1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.59%	22.32%	+4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.29%	22.17%	+4.12%

HEAL vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HEAL and DTCR have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

HEAL vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than DTCR's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF	0.87%	1.10%	1.72%	1.18%	2.57%	1.27%	0.30%
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF	0.26%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEAL and DTCR in my portfolio?

HEAL and DTCR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HEAL or DTCR?

DTCR has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to HEAL (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEAL dropped -65.76% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

Which ETF is better, HEAL or DTCR?

On 5-year performance, DTCR leads with 12.16% vs -12.46% for HEAL. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, HEAL has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HEAL or DTCR?

Over the 5-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 12.16% return vs -12.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEAL or DTCR?

HEAL and DTCR have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEAL or DTCR?

DTCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.26% for HEAL.

What is the main difference between HEAL and DTCR?

HEAL is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DTCR is REIT. HEAL tracks Global X HealthTech Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.