HEAL vs. BTEC
HEAL (Global X HealthTech ETF) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - HEAL tracks the Global X HealthTech Index while BTEC tracks the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. Both are passively managed. HEAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.
Performance
HEAL vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HEAL
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -15.57%
- 6M
- -20.78%
- 1Y
- -22.08%
- 3Y*
- -10.46%
- 5Y*
- -14.71%
- 10Y*
- —
BTEC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEAL vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | -7.14% |
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% |
HEAL vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEAL
BTEC
Healthcare
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
HEAL
BTEC
Technology
HEAL
BTEC
-
Basic Materials
HEAL
-
BTEC
-
Communication Services
HEAL
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
HEAL
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
HEAL
-
BTEC
-
Energy
HEAL
-
BTEC
-
Financial Services
HEAL
-
BTEC
-
Industrials
HEAL
-
BTEC
Real Estate
HEAL
-
BTEC
-
Utilities
HEAL
-
BTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEAL vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank
HEAL
BTEC
HEAL vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEAL | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEAL | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | — | — |
Drawdowns
HEAL vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and BTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEAL | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | 0.00% | -65.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.55% | 0.00% | -63.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | 0.00% | -43.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.13% | — | — |
Volatility
HEAL vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEAL | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.89% | 0.00% | +21.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.37% | 0.00% | +26.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.18% | 0.00% | +26.18% |
HEAL vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEAL vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison
HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HEAL.
HEAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.
HEAL tracks Global X HealthTech Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEAL and 0.42% for BTEC.
Find the right allocation for HEAL and BTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer