HEAL.L vs. QDVG.DE
HEAL.L (iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from iShares - HEAL.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD while QDVG.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEAL.L returned -1.96%/yr vs 5.76%/yr for QDVG.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEAL.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVG.DE.
Performance
HEAL.L vs. QDVG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HEAL.L is traded in USD, while QDVG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDVG.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEAL.L achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than QDVG.DE's -2.16% return.
HEAL.L
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- -0.41%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.96%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- 15.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
HEAL.L vs. QDVG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL.L iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.64% | 18.42% | 0.96% | 3.11% | -24.00% | -6.52% | 54.05% | 12.43% | -3.45% | 35.92% |
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -2.16% | 14.75% | 2.27% | 1.37% | -2.39% | 26.94% | 11.62% | 22.11% | 3.77% | 22.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEAL.L and QDVG.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.63 |
The correlation between HEAL.L and QDVG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEAL.L vs. QDVG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
HEAL.L
QDVG.DE
HEAL.L vs. QDVG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEAL.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEAL.L | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.42 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 3.52 | +0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEAL.L | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.01 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.38 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.55 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
HEAL.L vs. QDVG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEAL.L drawdown since its inception was -46.43%, which is greater than QDVG.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL.L and QDVG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEAL.L | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.43% | -27.71% | -18.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.59% | -10.56% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.46% | -17.48% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.70% | -17.48% | -26.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.00% | -4.70% | -15.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.60% | -4.97% | -13.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 4.26% | +0.86% |
Volatility
HEAL.L vs. QDVG.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEAL.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEAL.L | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 5.00% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 10.50% | +2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 14.78% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.87% | 14.82% | +5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 15.81% | +4.10% |
HEAL.L vs. QDVG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEAL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVG.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEAL.L vs. QDVG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither HEAL.L nor QDVG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HEAL.L and QDVG.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HEAL.L.
HEAL.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HEAL.L and 0.15% for QDVG.DE.
Find the right allocation for HEAL.L and QDVG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer