PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEAL.L vs. ESIH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEAL.L vs. ESIH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEAL.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HEAL.L is traded in USD, while ESIH.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ESIH.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEAL.L achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than ESIH.DE's -3.47% return.


HEAL.L

1D
3.48%
1M
4.82%
YTD
0.64%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
-1.96%
10Y*

ESIH.DE

1D
3.23%
1M
0.69%
YTD
-3.47%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEAL.L vs. ESIH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HEAL.L
iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.64%18.42%0.96%3.11%-24.00%-6.52%11.81%
ESIH.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-3.47%21.86%-1.86%11.03%-9.84%16.00%2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between HEAL.L and ESIH.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020

0.57

The correlation between HEAL.L and ESIH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEAL.L vs. ESIH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEAL.L
HEAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HEAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HEAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIH.DE
ESIH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ESIH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEAL.L vs. ESIH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEAL.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEAL.LESIH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.09

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

0.53

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

1.23

+2.73

HEAL.L vs. ESIH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the ESIH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEAL.L and ESIH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEAL.LESIH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

0.43

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.27

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.34

-0.02

Drawdowns

HEAL.L vs. ESIH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEAL.L drawdown since its inception was -46.43%, which is greater than ESIH.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL.L and ESIH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEAL.LESIH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.43%

-28.70%

-17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.59%

-14.88%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

-27.51%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

-28.70%

-15.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.00%

-11.87%

-8.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.60%

-8.01%

-10.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

6.36%

-1.24%

Volatility

HEAL.L vs. ESIH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEAL.L) is 5.13%, while iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIH.DE) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that HEAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEAL.LESIH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

6.16%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

13.37%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

18.47%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

17.61%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

17.31%

+2.60%

HEAL.L vs. ESIH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEAL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIH.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEAL.L vs. ESIH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HEAL.L nor ESIH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HEAL.L and ESIH.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIH.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIH.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HEAL.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HEAL.L and 0.18% for ESIH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEAL.L and ESIH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer