PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDRO.L vs. DFNG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HDRO.L vs. DFNG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HDRO.L) and VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HDRO.L vs. DFNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HDRO.L
VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
14.51%17.70%-29.88%-20.84%
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
13.21%68.35%43.76%25.48%
Different Trading Currencies

HDRO.L is traded in USD, while DFNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DFNG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDRO.L achieves a 14.51% return, which is significantly higher than DFNG.L's 13.21% return.


HDRO.L

1D
3.72%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
14.51%
6M
0.15%
1Y
62.24%
3Y*
-11.00%
5Y*
10Y*

DFNG.L

1D
5.79%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
13.21%
6M
5.68%
1Y
54.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HDRO.L vs. DFNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HDRO.L and DFNG.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Return for Risk

HDRO.L vs. DFNG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDRO.L
HDRO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HDRO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDRO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDRO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HDRO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDRO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

DFNG.L
DFNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDRO.L vs. DFNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HDRO.L) and VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDRO.LDFNG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

2.07

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

2.76

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.60

-1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.91

9.73

-3.83

HDRO.L vs. DFNG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDRO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDRO.L and DFNG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDRO.LDFNG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.07

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.50

2.42

-2.92

Correlation

The correlation between HDRO.L and DFNG.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HDRO.L vs. DFNG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HDRO.L nor DFNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HDRO.L vs. DFNG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDRO.L drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than DFNG.L's maximum drawdown of -14.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDRO.L and DFNG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HDRO.LDFNG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.30%

-12.87%

-68.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.66%

-12.87%

-11.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.72%

-6.46%

-59.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.07%

-2.62%

-51.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.45%

5.31%

+5.14%

Volatility

HDRO.L vs. DFNG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HDRO.L) is 8.71%, while VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a volatility of 9.92%. This indicates that HDRO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HDRO.LDFNG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.71%

9.92%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.75%

19.60%

+6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.22%

26.41%

+7.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.02%

21.11%

+16.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.02%

21.11%

+16.91%