PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDPMX vs. RYDVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDPMX vs. RYDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hodges Fund (HDPMX) and Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDPMX achieves a 22.63% return, which is significantly higher than RYDVX's 19.75% return. Over the past 10 years, HDPMX has outperformed RYDVX with an annualized return of 13.87%, while RYDVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.46% annualized return.


HDPMX

1D
3.15%
1M
-4.75%
6M
17.93%
YTD
22.63%
1Y
39.06%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
15.00%
10Y*
13.87%
ALL TIME*
10.33%

RYDVX

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.54%
6M
11.63%
YTD
19.75%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
11.46%
ALL TIME*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HDPMX vs. RYDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDPMX
Hodges Fund
22.63%24.06%29.32%29.81%-21.80%29.50%29.58%23.02%-34.39%13.87%
RYDVX
Royce Dividend Value Fund
19.75%9.44%19.41%23.29%-13.63%20.00%4.45%30.00%-16.33%21.39%

Correlation

The correlation between HDPMX and RYDVX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between HDPMX and RYDVX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDPMX vs. RYDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HDPMX
HDPMX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HDPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HDPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

RYDVX
RYDVX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RYDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RYDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HDPMX vs. RYDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hodges Fund (HDPMX) and Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDPMXRYDVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.31

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

6.68

+1.90

HDPMX vs. RYDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDPMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the RYDVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDPMX and RYDVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDPMX vs. RYDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDPMX drawdown since its inception was -69.66%, which is greater than RYDVX's maximum drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDPMX and RYDVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDPMXRYDVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.66%

-53.36%

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-12.32%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.65%

-21.45%

-11.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

-27.35%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.16%

-41.49%

-25.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.73%

-0.75%

-7.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.69%

-7.49%

-8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

4.26%

-0.38%

Volatility

HDPMX vs. RYDVX - Volatility Comparison

Hodges Fund (HDPMX) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX) at 4.57%. This indicates that HDPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDPMXRYDVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

4.57%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.29%

11.73%

+7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.42%

18.50%

+5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.80%

19.07%

+10.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.42%

19.62%

+10.80%

HDPMX vs. RYDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDPMX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than RYDVX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDPMX vs. RYDVX - Dividend Comparison

HDPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, less than RYDVX's 154.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDPMX
Hodges Fund
7.74%9.50%15.93%0.72%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.67%7.26%0.00%1.04%
RYDVX
Royce Dividend Value Fund
154.32%185.21%21.24%11.80%0.57%14.07%5.55%15.61%14.15%14.26%10.48%11.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDPMX and RYDVX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDPMX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to RYDVX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDPMX dropped -69.66% vs RYDVX's -53.36%.

RYDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDPMX and RYDVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer