PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDPBX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDPBX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund (HDPBX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDPBX achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HDPBX has outperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 17.24%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.16% annualized return.


HDPBX

1D
0.47%
1M
5.82%
YTD
8.42%
6M
8.08%
1Y
28.29%
3Y*
31.28%
5Y*
19.47%
10Y*
17.24%

RESGX

1D
2.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
27.79%
6M
28.15%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDPBX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDPBX
Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund
8.42%23.40%52.30%21.54%-11.52%23.61%15.88%30.72%-9.38%24.73%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.79%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between HDPBX and RESGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between HDPBX and RESGX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDPBX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDPBX
HDPBX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HDPBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDPBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDPBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
HDPBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDPBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDPBX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund (HDPBX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDPBXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.56

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

5.89

-3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

21.39

-11.70

HDPBX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDPBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDPBX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDPBXRESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

3.21

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.61

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.71

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.72

+0.10

Drawdowns

HDPBX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDPBX drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum RESGX drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDPBX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDPBXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-37.80%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-7.84%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.96%

-20.50%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-23.58%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-37.80%

+2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-5.00%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.15%

+0.92%

Volatility

HDPBX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund (HDPBX) is 3.30%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that HDPBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDPBXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

5.45%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

11.00%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

14.41%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.87%

17.26%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.28%

18.71%

+0.57%

HDPBX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDPBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDPBX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

HDPBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than RESGX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDPBX
Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund
4.55%4.97%27.38%0.90%8.75%10.88%5.26%7.59%5.83%9.44%5.04%7.86%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.52%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDPBX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to HDPBX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDPBX dropped -35.10% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDPBX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer