HDLV.L vs. PQVM.L
HDLV.L (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist) and PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from Invesco - HDLV.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index while PQVM.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDLV.L returned 5.04%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for PQVM.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDLV.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVM.L.
Performance
HDLV.L vs. PQVM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDLV.L achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than PQVM.L's 16.65% return.
HDLV.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 9.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
PQVM.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- 24.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
HDLV.L vs. PQVM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLV.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist | 4.40% | 3.58% | 16.39% | 1.20% | 0.46% | 24.79% | -10.93% | 18.82% | -7.10% | 8.39% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 16.65% | 13.66% | 30.17% | 6.82% | 0.52% | 26.13% | 8.05% | 25.07% | -6.99% | 18.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLV.L and PQVM.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.64 |
The correlation between HDLV.L and PQVM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDLV.L vs. PQVM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
-
Consumer Defensive
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
Financial Services
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
Energy
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
Utilities
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
Communication Services
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
Healthcare
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
Consumer Cyclical
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
Technology
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
Industrials
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
Basic Materials
HDLV.L
-
PQVM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDLV.L vs. PQVM.L — Risk / Return Rank
HDLV.L
PQVM.L
HDLV.L vs. PQVM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDLV.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.37 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 4.70 | -3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 16.26 | -13.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDLV.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 2.06 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.96 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.87 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
HDLV.L vs. PQVM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLV.L drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, which is greater than PQVM.L's maximum drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLV.L and PQVM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLV.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.02% | -34.42% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -4.83% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.59% | -15.49% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.04% | -17.35% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | 0.00% | -5.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -3.90% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 1.40% | +1.70% |
Volatility
HDLV.L vs. PQVM.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) have volatilities of 3.06% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDLV.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 3.15% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 8.76% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 11.01% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 16.13% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 17.13% | -0.97% |
HDLV.L vs. PQVM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDLV.L vs. PQVM.L - Dividend Comparison
HDLV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than PQVM.L's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLV.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist | 3.74% | 3.91% | 3.54% | 4.04% | 3.56% | 3.37% | 4.35% | 3.69% | 3.79% | 3.07% | 3.07% | 1.89% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 0.89% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDLV.L and PQVM.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HDLV.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HDLV.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.
HDLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HDLV.L and 0.35% for PQVM.L.
Find the right allocation for HDLV.L and PQVM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer