PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HDLV.L is traded in USD, while HDLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HDLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HDLV.L having a 4.40% return and HDLG.L slightly lower at 4.36%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HDLV.L having a 6.48% annualized return and HDLG.L not far ahead at 6.50%.


HDLV.L

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
4.40%
6M
5.51%
1Y
8.68%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
6.48%

HDLG.L

1D
0.16%
1M
0.09%
YTD
4.36%
6M
5.63%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDLV.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist
4.40%3.58%16.39%1.20%0.46%24.79%-10.93%18.82%-7.10%11.38%
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
4.36%3.70%16.49%0.52%0.42%25.32%-11.25%19.69%-7.24%11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between HDLV.L and HDLG.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2015

0.92

The correlation between HDLV.L and HDLG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDLV.L
HDLG.L

Real Estate

20.1%
21.3%

Consumer Defensive

17.8%
18.4%

Financial Services

15.6%
15.9%

Energy

14.1%
12.0%

Utilities

13.7%
13.8%

Communication Services

8.6%
8.5%

Healthcare

5.1%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
3.5%

Technology

1.4%
1.5%

Industrials

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Real Estate

HDLV.L
20.1%
HDLG.L
21.3%

Consumer Defensive

HDLV.L
17.8%
HDLG.L
18.4%

Financial Services

HDLV.L
15.6%
HDLG.L
15.9%

Energy

HDLV.L
14.1%
HDLG.L
12.0%

Utilities

HDLV.L
13.7%
HDLG.L
13.8%

Communication Services

HDLV.L
8.6%
HDLG.L
8.5%

Healthcare

HDLV.L
5.1%
HDLG.L
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HDLV.L
3.4%
HDLG.L
3.5%

Technology

HDLV.L
1.4%
HDLG.L
1.5%

Industrials

HDLV.L
0.0%
HDLG.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

HDLV.L

-

HDLG.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLV.L
HDLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
HDLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

HDLG.L
HDLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDLV.LHDLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

2.78

+0.02

HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLV.L and HDLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDLV.LHDLG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.81

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.36

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.40

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.47

0.00

Drawdowns

HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLV.L drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, roughly equal to the maximum HDLG.L drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLV.L and HDLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDLV.LHDLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.02%

-40.58%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-6.96%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-14.74%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.04%

-20.22%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.02%

-40.58%

-0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

-5.18%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-5.69%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.09%

+0.01%

Volatility

HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) have volatilities of 3.06% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDLV.LHDLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.11%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

7.91%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

10.59%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

14.04%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

16.26%

-0.10%

HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HDLV.L and HDLG.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

HDLV.L vs. HDLG.L - Dividend Comparison

HDLV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, which matches HDLG.L's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
3.73%3.93%3.46%4.12%3.49%3.30%4.65%3.77%3.67%3.18%2.88%1.86%
HDLV.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist
3.74%3.91%3.54%4.04%3.56%3.37%4.35%3.69%3.79%3.07%3.07%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, HDLV.L and HDLG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDLV.L and HDLG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDLV.L and HDLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer