HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HDLG.L (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - HDLG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while XLKS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDLG.L returned 7.28%/yr vs 27.23%/yr for XLKS.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDLG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.

Performance

HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HDLG.L is traded in GBp, while XLKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLKS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDLG.L achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than XLKS.L's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HDLG.L has underperformed XLKS.L with an annualized return of 7.28%, while XLKS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.23% annualized return.

HDLG.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 4.86%
• 1Y: 9.65%
• 3Y*: 8.12%
• 5Y*: 6.17%
• 10Y*: 7.28%

XLKS.L

• 1D: -2.32%
• 1M: 14.28%
• YTD: 24.03%
• 6M: 22.23%
• 1Y: 54.41%
• 3Y*: 33.26%
• 5Y*: 26.61%
• 10Y*: 27.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HDLG.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF	4.61%	-3.57%	18.46%	-4.52%	12.44%	26.47%	-13.89%	15.07%	-1.67%	1.44%
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	24.03%	15.38%	44.20%	52.61%	-20.70%	36.00%	38.58%	43.17%	3.27%	21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between HDLG.L and XLKS.L is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2015	0.38

The correlation between HDLG.L and XLKS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HDLG.L	XLKS.L
Real Estate	21.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	18.4%	-
Financial Services	15.9%	7.3%
Utilities	13.8%	-
Energy	12.0%	-
Communication Services	8.5%	-
Healthcare	5.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.5%	-
Technology	1.5%	91.2%
Industrials	0.0%	1.5%
Basic Materials	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLG.L

HDLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
HDLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
HDLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
HDLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
HDLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

XLKS.L

XLKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XLKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
XLKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
XLKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XLKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HDLG.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	2.68	-1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	3.44	-2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.44	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	3.20	-1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	8.18	-4.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLG.L and XLKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HDLG.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	2.68	-1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	1.16	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	1.23	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	1.10	-0.52

Drawdowns

HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than XLKS.L's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLG.L and XLKS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDLG.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.75%	-28.80%	-4.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.92%	-16.92%	+10.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.61%	-28.80%	+13.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.84%	-28.80%	+10.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.75%	-28.80%	-4.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	-2.80%	-2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.30%	-4.71%	-1.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	6.63%	-3.92%

Volatility

HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) is 2.93%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that HDLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDLG.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	7.55%	-4.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.26%	15.35%	-7.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.53%	20.23%	-9.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.96%	23.02%	-10.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.66%	22.09%	-6.43%

HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDLG.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison

HDLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, while XLKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDLG.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF	3.73%	3.93%	3.46%	4.12%	3.49%	3.30%	4.65%	3.77%	3.67%	3.18%	2.88%	1.86%
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDLG.L and XLKS.L in my portfolio?

HDLG.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HDLG.L or XLKS.L?

On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HDLG.L or XLKS.L?

XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLG.L.

What is the main difference between HDLG.L and XLKS.L?

HDLG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XLKS.L is Technology Equities. HDLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HDLG.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.