HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HDLG.L (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from Invesco - HDLG.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index while PQVG.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDLG.L returned 6.17%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for PQVG.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDLG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVG.L.

Performance

HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDLG.L achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 16.79% return.

HDLG.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 4.86%
• 1Y: 9.65%
• 3Y*: 8.12%
• 5Y*: 6.17%
• 10Y*: 7.28%

PQVG.L

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 5.36%
• YTD: 16.79%
• 6M: 17.07%
• 1Y: 24.01%
• 3Y*: 21.17%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HDLG.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF	4.61%	-3.57%	18.46%	-4.52%	12.44%	26.47%	-13.89%	15.07%	-1.67%	4.34%
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	16.79%	5.84%	32.29%	0.98%	12.54%	27.78%	4.44%	21.16%	-1.98%	14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between HDLG.L and PQVG.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between HDLG.L and PQVG.L has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HDLG.L	PQVG.L
Real Estate	21.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	18.4%	5.6%
Financial Services	15.9%	21.8%
Utilities	13.8%	0.8%
Energy	12.0%	5.6%
Communication Services	8.5%	10.4%
Healthcare	5.0%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	3.5%	4.3%
Technology	1.5%	24.3%
Industrials	0.0%	15.6%
Basic Materials	0.0%	2.2%

Return for Risk

HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLG.L

HDLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
HDLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
HDLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
HDLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
HDLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

PQVG.L

PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HDLG.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	2.31	-1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	3.28	-1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.41	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	5.82	-4.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	17.49	-13.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLG.L and PQVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HDLG.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	2.31	-1.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	1.12	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.89	-0.31

Drawdowns

HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than PQVG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLG.L and PQVG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDLG.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.75%	-25.88%	-7.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.92%	-4.11%	-2.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.61%	-17.44%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.84%	-17.44%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	0.00%	-4.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.30%	-4.17%	-2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	1.37%	+1.34%

Volatility

HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) at 2.79%. This indicates that HDLG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDLG.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	2.79%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.26%	7.88%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.53%	10.37%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.96%	14.89%	-1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.66%	16.24%	-0.58%

HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDLG.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison

HDLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than PQVG.L's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HDLG.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF	3.73%	3.93%	3.46%	4.12%	3.49%	3.30%	4.65%	3.77%	3.67%	3.18%	2.88%	1.86%
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	0.77%	0.82%	0.82%	1.61%	1.77%	0.87%	1.59%	1.41%	1.30%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDLG.L and PQVG.L in my portfolio?

HDLG.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HDLG.L or PQVG.L?

On fees, HDLG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HDLG.L or PQVG.L?

HDLG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.

What is the main difference between HDLG.L and PQVG.L?

HDLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HDLG.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.