PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDLG.L vs. IUCM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HDLG.L vs. IUCM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HDLG.L vs. IUCM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
4.42%-3.57%18.46%-4.52%12.44%26.47%-13.89%15.07%-5.32%
IUCM.L
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
-1.85%17.47%41.41%47.96%-33.47%23.51%19.04%25.86%-8.26%
Different Trading Currencies

HDLG.L is traded in GBp, while IUCM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUCM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDLG.L achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly higher than IUCM.L's -1.85% return.


HDLG.L

1D
-1.04%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
4.42%
6M
2.65%
1Y
-0.70%
3Y*
6.68%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
7.28%

IUCM.L

1D
1.99%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-1.85%
6M
2.27%
1Y
22.86%
3Y*
26.84%
5Y*
12.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HDLG.L vs. IUCM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUCM.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HDLG.L vs. IUCM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLG.L
HDLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

IUCM.L
IUCM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLG.L vs. IUCM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDLG.LIUCM.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.05

1.35

-1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.02

1.96

-1.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.24

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

2.84

-2.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.09

9.65

-9.74

HDLG.L vs. IUCM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLG.L and IUCM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDLG.LIUCM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

1.35

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.65

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.70

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between HDLG.L and IUCM.L is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HDLG.L vs. IUCM.L - Dividend Comparison

HDLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, while IUCM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
3.73%3.93%3.46%4.12%3.49%3.30%4.65%3.77%3.67%3.18%2.88%1.86%
IUCM.L
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HDLG.L vs. IUCM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, smaller than the maximum IUCM.L drawdown of -38.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLG.L and IUCM.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HDLG.LIUCM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-47.32%

+13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-9.86%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

-47.32%

+29.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-6.12%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-10.39%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.61%

+0.92%

Volatility

HDLG.L vs. IUCM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) is 4.04%, while iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that HDLG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HDLG.LIUCM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

5.22%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

10.32%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

16.90%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.96%

19.53%

-6.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

20.33%

-4.67%