PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDLG.L achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.L's 7.45% return.


HDLG.L

1D
1.42%
1M
3.72%
6M
14.46%
YTD
15.70%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
8.82%
10Y*
6.72%
ALL TIME*
5.52%

5ESG.L

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.60%
6M
5.70%
YTD
7.45%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
£46.89K£51.02K£215.68K
£667.57K£702.70K£1.08M

HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
15.70%-3.57%18.46%-4.52%12.44%26.47%-13.89%7.33%
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
7.45%18.26%23.62%26.17%-20.24%31.59%15.83%16.65%

Correlation

The correlation between HDLG.L and 5ESG.L is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019

0.36

The correlation between HDLG.L and 5ESG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDLG.L
5ESG.L

Real Estate

21.9%
2.2%

Financial Services

17.7%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

14.9%
5.0%

Utilities

14.3%
1.4%

Energy

12.5%
2.6%

Communication Services

8.0%
11.7%

Healthcare

5.0%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
5.1%

Technology

1.7%
37.4%

Industrials

0.0%
9.1%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.9%

Real Estate

HDLG.L
21.9%
5ESG.L
2.2%

Financial Services

HDLG.L
17.7%
5ESG.L
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

HDLG.L
14.9%
5ESG.L
5.0%

Utilities

HDLG.L
14.3%
5ESG.L
1.4%

Energy

HDLG.L
12.5%
5ESG.L
2.6%

Communication Services

HDLG.L
8.0%
5ESG.L
11.7%

Healthcare

HDLG.L
5.0%
5ESG.L
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HDLG.L
3.9%
5ESG.L
5.1%

Technology

HDLG.L
1.7%
5ESG.L
37.4%

Industrials

HDLG.L
0.0%
5ESG.L
9.1%

Basic Materials

HDLG.L
0.0%
5ESG.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLG.L
HDLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

5ESG.L
5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDLG.L5ESG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.06

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

8.65

-2.73

HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the 5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLG.L and 5ESG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, which is greater than 5ESG.L's maximum drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLG.L and 5ESG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDLG.L5ESG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.91%

-36.07%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-9.01%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-19.53%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

-25.41%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.46%

+2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-5.32%

-3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.16%

+0.58%

Volatility

HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) at 3.48%. This indicates that HDLG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDLG.L5ESG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

3.48%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

9.59%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.06%

12.14%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.02%

16.22%

-3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

17.98%

-2.44%

HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison

HDLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than 5ESG.L's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
0.25%0.87%0.47%1.07%1.32%0.89%1.25%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
3.36%3.94%3.46%4.11%3.49%3.30%4.65%3.77%3.67%3.17%2.88%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDLG.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLG.L.

HDLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HDLG.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDLG.L and 5ESG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer