HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L
HDLG.L (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and 5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) are both S&P 500 funds - HDLG.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index while 5ESG.L tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDLG.L returned 8.82%/yr vs 11.65%/yr for 5ESG.L. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HDLG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for 5ESG.L.
Performance
HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDLG.L achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.L's 7.45% return.
HDLG.L
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 14.46%
- YTD
- 15.70%
- 1Y
- 16.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- 6.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.52%
5ESG.L
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| £46.89K | £51.02K | £215.68K | |
| £667.57K | £702.70K | £1.08M |
HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLG.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 15.70% | -3.57% | 18.46% | -4.52% | 12.44% | 26.47% | -13.89% | 7.33% |
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 7.45% | 18.26% | 23.62% | 26.17% | -20.24% | 31.59% | 15.83% | 16.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLG.L and 5ESG.L is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.36 |
The correlation between HDLG.L and 5ESG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Financial Services
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Defensive
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Utilities
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Energy
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Communication Services
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Healthcare
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Cyclical
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Technology
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Industrials
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Basic Materials
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank
HDLG.L
5ESG.L
HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDLG.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.06 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 8.65 | -2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, which is greater than 5ESG.L's maximum drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLG.L and 5ESG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLG.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.91% | -36.07% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.92% | -9.01% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -19.53% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -25.41% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.46% | +2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -5.32% | -3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 2.16% | +0.58% |
Volatility
HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) at 3.48%. This indicates that HDLG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDLG.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 3.48% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 9.59% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.06% | 12.14% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 16.22% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 17.98% | -2.44% |
HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDLG.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison
HDLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than 5ESG.L's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDLG.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 3.36% | 3.94% | 3.46% | 4.11% | 3.49% | 3.30% | 4.65% | 3.77% | 3.67% | 3.17% | 2.88% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDLG.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLG.L.
HDLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HDLG.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
Find the right allocation for HDLG.L and 5ESG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer