PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDLB vs. SLVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDLB vs. SLVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDLB achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than SLVO's 13.49% return.


HDLB

1D
-1.72%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
9.69%
6M
8.78%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*

SLVO

1D
-1.17%
1M
4.05%
YTD
13.49%
6M
17.86%
1Y
62.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDLB vs. SLVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HDLB and SLVO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDLB vs. SLVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLB
HDLB Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
HDLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVO
SLVO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SLVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLB vs. SLVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDLBSLVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.44

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

3.65

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

15.01

-12.31

HDLB vs. SLVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the SLVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLB and SLVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDLBSLVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.13

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

1.61

-1.51

Drawdowns

HDLB vs. SLVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLB drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, which is greater than SLVO's maximum drawdown of -17.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLB and SLVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDLBSLVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.70%

-17.23%

-61.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-17.23%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.15%

-3.22%

-10.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.47%

-3.13%

-24.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

4.18%

+2.44%

Volatility

HDLB vs. SLVO - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) have volatilities of 6.21% and 6.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDLBSLVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

6.39%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.14%

27.33%

-9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.46%

29.53%

-3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.55%

25.23%

+5.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.58%

25.23%

+18.35%

HDLB vs. SLVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDLB vs. SLVO - Dividend Comparison

HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.13%, less than SLVO's 46.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
12.13%12.20%10.09%12.36%10.86%8.07%16.23%0.97%
SLVO
UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN
46.44%19.35%14.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDLB and SLVO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLVO has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to HDLB (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDLB dropped -78.70% vs SLVO's -17.23%.

On 1-year performance, SLVO leads with 62.53% vs 17.78% for HDLB. On fees, SLVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, HDLB has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SLVO has performed better with a 62.53% return vs 17.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.

SLVO has the higher dividend yield at 46.44%, compared with 12.13% for HDLB.

HDLB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SLVO is Silver. HDLB tracks Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%), while SLVO tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.65% for HDLB and 0.65% for SLVO.

SLVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDLB and SLVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer