HDLB vs. GLDI
HDLB (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B) and GLDI (UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033) are both exchange-traded funds - HDLB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%), while GLDI is a Gold fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDLB returned 12.53%/yr vs 10.96%/yr for GLDI. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDLB charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GLDI.
Performance
HDLB vs. GLDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDLB achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly higher than GLDI's -4.45% return.
HDLB
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 12.54%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 28.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDI
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -5.42%
- 1Y
- 11.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
HDLB vs. GLDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 12.54% | 27.26% | 28.21% | -4.12% | -11.46% | 62.67% | -50.94% | 8.33% |
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 | -4.45% | 34.25% | 17.76% | 8.93% | -1.11% | -3.42% | 23.50% | 0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLB and GLDI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDLB vs. GLDI — Risk / Return Rank
HDLB
GLDI
HDLB vs. GLDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDLB | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.16 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 0.83 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 2.73 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDLB vs. GLDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLB drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, which is greater than GLDI's maximum drawdown of -32.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLB and GLDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLB | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.70% | -32.26% | -46.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -14.14% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | -14.14% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.81% | -14.14% | -29.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.92% | -13.28% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.33% | -13.99% | -13.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.15% | 4.30% | +2.85% |
Volatility
HDLB vs. GLDI - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) has a higher volatility of 9.49% compared to UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) at 7.18%. This indicates that HDLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDLB | GLDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.49% | 7.18% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.68% | 14.58% | +5.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.28% | 15.99% | +11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.69% | 11.58% | +19.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.52% | 11.52% | +32.00% |
HDLB vs. GLDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDLB vs. GLDI - Dividend Comparison
HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, less than GLDI's 26.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 | 26.67% | 16.15% | 10.45% | 10.02% | 13.73% | 10.65% | 14.25% | 7.25% | 5.33% | 7.77% | 17.26% | 10.07% |
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 11.27% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDLB and GLDI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDLB has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to GLDI (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDLB dropped -78.70% vs GLDI's -32.26%.
On 5-year performance, HDLB leads with 12.53% vs 10.96% for GLDI. On fees, GLDI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GLDI has been the lower-risk option at 7.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDLB has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.
GLDI has the higher dividend yield at 26.67%, compared with 11.27% for HDLB.
HDLB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GLDI is Gold. HDLB tracks Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%), while GLDI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.65% for HDLB and 0.65% for GLDI.
GLDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDLB and GLDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer