HDLB vs. CRMU
HDLB (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B) and CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - HDLB tracks the Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%) while CRMU tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. HDLB charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMU.
Performance
HDLB vs. CRMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HDLB
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 12.54%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 28.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- —
CRMU
- 1D
- -13.83%
- 1M
- -28.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDLB vs. CRMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | -4.99% |
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | -64.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLB and CRMU is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDLB vs. CRMU — Risk / Return Rank
HDLB
CRMU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HDLB vs. CRMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDLB | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDLB vs. CRMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLB drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, which is greater than CRMU's maximum drawdown of -73.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLB and CRMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLB | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.70% | -73.81% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.92% | -64.46% | +52.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.33% | -46.63% | +19.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.15% | — | — |
Volatility
HDLB vs. CRMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDLB | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.28% | 246.03% | -218.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.69% | 246.03% | -215.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.52% | 246.03% | -202.51% |
HDLB vs. CRMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMU's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDLB vs. CRMU - Dividend Comparison
HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, while CRMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 11.27% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDLB and CRMU have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.
HDLB has the higher dividend yield at 11.27%, compared with 0.00% for CRMU.
HDLB tracks Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%), while CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.65% for HDLB and 0.75% for CRMU.
Find the right allocation for HDLB and CRMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer