PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDLB vs. BRKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HDLB vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HDLB vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDLB achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than BRKW's -6.49% return.


HDLB

1D
-2.03%
1M
-9.81%
YTD
15.23%
6M
5.83%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*

BRKW

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
-6.49%
6M
-6.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HDLB vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HDLB vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLB
HDLB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
HDLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

BRKW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLB vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDLBBRKWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.89

HDLB vs. BRKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDLBBRKWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

-0.32

+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between HDLB and BRKW is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HDLB vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.03%, less than BRKW's 20.90% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
11.03%12.20%10.09%12.36%10.86%8.07%16.23%0.97%
BRKW
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF
20.90%14.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HDLB vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLB drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -11.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLB and BRKW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HDLBBRKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.70%

-11.86%

-66.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.81%

-9.47%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.92%

-4.29%

-23.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.26%

Volatility

HDLB vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HDLBBRKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.76%

17.90%

+14.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.43%

17.90%

+12.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.94%

17.90%

+26.04%