HDLB vs. BRKW
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW).
HDLB and BRKW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HDLB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). It was launched on Oct 24, 2019. BRKW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 17, 2025.
Performance
HDLB vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HDLB vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 15.23% | 7.13% |
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | -6.49% | 2.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDLB achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than BRKW's -6.49% return.
HDLB
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -9.81%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 18.66%
- 3Y*
- 24.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- —
BRKW
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- -6.49%
- 6M
- -6.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HDLB vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HDLB vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank
HDLB
BRKW
HDLB vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDLB | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDLB | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.32 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLB and BRKW is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HDLB vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison
HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.03%, less than BRKW's 20.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 11.03% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% |
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | 20.90% | 14.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HDLB vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLB drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -11.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLB and BRKW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLB | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.70% | -11.86% | -66.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.81% | -9.47% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.92% | -4.29% | -23.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | — | — |
Volatility
HDLB vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HDLB | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.76% | 17.90% | +14.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.43% | 17.90% | +12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.94% | 17.90% | +26.04% |