PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDIV.TO vs. NXF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDIV.TO vs. NXF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDIV.TO achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than NXF.TO's 32.43% return.


HDIV.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
6.14%
YTD
16.21%
6M
17.63%
1Y
45.50%
3Y*
27.58%
5Y*
10Y*

NXF.TO

1D
1.17%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
32.43%
6M
29.37%
1Y
45.90%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
17.39%
10Y*
8.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDIV.TO vs. NXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HDIV.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF
16.21%33.87%23.15%13.91%-2.52%12.70%
NXF.TO
CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)
32.43%9.19%-4.66%6.48%43.93%16.63%

Correlation

The correlation between HDIV.TO and NXF.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between HDIV.TO and NXF.TO has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HDIV.TO vs. NXF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDIV.TO
NXF.TO

Financial Services

39.8%

-

Energy

18.4%
100.0%

Basic Materials

13.4%

-

Technology

9.5%

-

Communication Services

6.3%

-

Utilities

4.7%

-

Industrials

3.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.3%

-

Healthcare

0.2%

-

Financial Services

HDIV.TO
39.8%
NXF.TO

-

Energy

HDIV.TO
18.4%
NXF.TO
100.0%

Basic Materials

HDIV.TO
13.4%
NXF.TO

-

Technology

HDIV.TO
9.5%
NXF.TO

-

Communication Services

HDIV.TO
6.3%
NXF.TO

-

Utilities

HDIV.TO
4.7%
NXF.TO

-

Industrials

HDIV.TO
3.0%
NXF.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

HDIV.TO
2.5%
NXF.TO

-

Real Estate

HDIV.TO
2.1%
NXF.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HDIV.TO
0.3%
NXF.TO

-

Healthcare

HDIV.TO
0.2%
NXF.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDIV.TO vs. NXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDIV.TO
HDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

NXF.TO
NXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDIV.TO vs. NXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDIV.TONXF.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.67

2.36

+1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.70

3.03

+1.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.38

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

4.90

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.39

13.97

+11.42

HDIV.TO vs. NXF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDIV.TO and NXF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDIV.TONXF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67

2.36

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.22

+1.04

Drawdowns

HDIV.TO vs. NXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.32%, smaller than the maximum NXF.TO drawdown of -65.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDIV.TO and NXF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDIV.TONXF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.32%

-65.25%

+42.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-9.41%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-24.26%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-5.01%

+4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-16.04%

+11.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

3.30%

-1.50%

Volatility

HDIV.TO vs. NXF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) is 3.80%, while CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that HDIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDIV.TONXF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

7.55%

-3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

15.65%

-5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

19.57%

-7.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

23.39%

-7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

26.16%

-10.53%

Dividends

HDIV.TO vs. NXF.TO - Dividend Comparison

HDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, more than NXF.TO's 8.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDIV.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF
9.33%10.09%11.38%10.41%9.64%3.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NXF.TO
CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)
8.04%7.70%8.50%8.60%11.22%9.48%11.23%7.83%9.38%6.50%8.24%8.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDIV.TO and NXF.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDIV.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while NXF.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDIV.TO and NXF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer