HDIV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO
HDIV.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF) and CDAY.NEO (Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HDIV.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CDAY.NEO.
Performance
HDIV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDIV.TO achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than CDAY.NEO's 13.70% return.
HDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 45.50%
- 3Y*
- 27.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDAY.NEO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDIV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF | 16.21% | 20.26% |
CDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF | 13.70% | 14.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDIV.TO and CDAY.NEO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.83 |
HDIV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Energy
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Basic Materials
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Technology
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Communication Services
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Utilities
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Industrials
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Consumer Cyclical
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Real Estate
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Consumer Defensive
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Healthcare
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDIV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
HDIV.TO
CDAY.NEO
HDIV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF (CDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDIV.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.67 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.70 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.24 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.39 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDIV.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 3.03 | -1.77 |
Drawdowns
HDIV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.32%, which is greater than CDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -8.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDIV.TO and CDAY.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDIV.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.32% | -8.00% | -14.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.83% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -1.02% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | — | — |
Volatility
HDIV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDIV.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 11.37% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 11.37% | +4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 11.37% | +4.26% |
HDIV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDIV.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDIV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
HDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, less than CDAY.NEO's 14.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF | 14.55% | 7.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF | 9.33% | 10.09% | 11.38% | 10.41% | 9.64% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDIV.TO and CDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CDAY.NEO.
Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HDIV.TO and 0.85% for CDAY.NEO.
Find the right allocation for HDIV.TO and CDAY.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer