HDIV.TO vs. CANY.TO
HDIV.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF) and CANY.TO (Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDIV.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CANY.TO.
Performance
HDIV.TO vs. CANY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDIV.TO achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than CANY.TO's 10.38% return.
HDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 45.50%
- 3Y*
- 27.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANY.TO
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDIV.TO vs. CANY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF | 16.21% | 9.66% |
CANY.TO Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF | 10.38% | 5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDIV.TO and CANY.TO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDIV.TO vs. CANY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HDIV.TO
CANY.TO
HDIV.TO vs. CANY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) and Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDIV.TO | CANY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.39 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDIV.TO | CANY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.42 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
HDIV.TO vs. CANY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.32%, which is greater than CANY.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDIV.TO and CANY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDIV.TO | CANY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.32% | -8.34% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -1.47% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -2.13% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | — | — |
Volatility
HDIV.TO vs. CANY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDIV.TO | CANY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 17.38% | -4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 17.38% | -1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 17.38% | -1.75% |
HDIV.TO vs. CANY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDIV.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CANY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDIV.TO vs. CANY.TO - Dividend Comparison
HDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, less than CANY.TO's 14.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANY.TO Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF | 14.06% | 5.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF | 9.33% | 10.09% | 11.38% | 10.41% | 9.64% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDIV.TO and CANY.TO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CANY.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HDIV.TO and 0.40% for CANY.TO.
Find the right allocation for HDIV.TO and CANY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer