HDG vs. EMPB
HDG (ProShares Hedge Replication) and EMPB (Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF) are both Long-Short funds. HDG is passively managed, while EMPB is actively managed. Over the past year, HDG returned 13.22% vs 21.16% for EMPB. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDG charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for EMPB.
Performance
HDG vs. EMPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDG achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than EMPB's 13.46% return.
HDG
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 13.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
EMPB
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 13.46%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDG vs. EMPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HDG ProShares Hedge Replication | 6.40% | 7.18% | -0.79% |
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF | 13.46% | 14.84% | 0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDG and EMPB is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between HDG and EMPB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDG vs. EMPB — Risk / Return Rank
HDG
EMPB
HDG vs. EMPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) and Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDG | EMPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.35 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 3.55 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 10.44 | +3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDG | EMPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.87 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.75 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
HDG vs. EMPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDG drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than EMPB's maximum drawdown of -7.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDG and EMPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDG | EMPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -7.55% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.97% | -5.98% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.16% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -1.50% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 2.03% | -1.07% |
Volatility
HDG vs. EMPB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) is 2.06%, while Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that HDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDG | EMPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 2.57% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.58% | 8.47% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.64% | 11.39% | -5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 11.81% | -4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 11.81% | -4.70% |
HDG vs. EMPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EMPB's 1.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDG vs. EMPB - Dividend Comparison
HDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than EMPB's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF | 0.77% | 0.88% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDG ProShares Hedge Replication | 2.35% | 2.55% | 3.50% | 3.48% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.09% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDG and EMPB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMPB has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to HDG (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDG dropped -15.31% vs EMPB's -7.55%.
On 1-year performance, EMPB leads with 21.16% vs 13.22% for HDG. On fees, HDG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EMPB has performed better with a 21.16% return vs 13.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.82% for EMPB.
HDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.77% for EMPB.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Empowered Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for HDG and 1.82% for EMPB.
HDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDG and EMPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer