HDEM.L vs. IGDA.L
HDEM.L (Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and IGDA.L (Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - HDEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while IGDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDEM.L returned 12.01%/yr vs 18.37%/yr for IGDA.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDEM.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IGDA.L.
Performance
HDEM.L vs. IGDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HDEM.L is traded in GBp, while IGDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDEM.L achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than IGDA.L's 16.03% return.
HDEM.L
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
IGDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.78%
- YTD
- 16.03%
- 6M
- 15.65%
- 1Y
- 36.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDEM.L vs. IGDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDEM.L Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 8.36% | 18.32% | 3.92% | 3.74% | -4.63% |
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 15.51% | 10.28% | 20.00% | 23.23% | -5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDEM.L and IGDA.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.33 |
HDEM.L vs. IGDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Energy
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Industrials
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Utilities
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Consumer Defensive
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Communication Services
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Basic Materials
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Real Estate
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Technology
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Healthcare
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDEM.L vs. IGDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
HDEM.L
IGDA.L
HDEM.L vs. IGDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDEM.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.48 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.80 | 5.08 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.83 | 18.17 | -4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDEM.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.68 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.92 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
HDEM.L vs. IGDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -32.18%, which is greater than IGDA.L's maximum drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEM.L and IGDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDEM.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.18% | -22.43% | -9.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.28% | -7.20% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.22% | -22.43% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -0.43% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -3.93% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.02% | -0.19% |
Volatility
HDEM.L vs. IGDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) is 2.93%, while Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that HDEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDEM.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 4.57% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 10.31% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 13.67% | -3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 17.32% | -3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 17.32% | -1.50% |
HDEM.L vs. IGDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDEM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IGDA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDEM.L vs. IGDA.L - Dividend Comparison
HDEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, while IGDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDEM.L Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 4.86% | 5.17% | 5.62% | 6.08% | 8.93% | 5.96% | 4.31% | 5.23% | 5.37% | 6.81% | 2.78% |
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDEM.L and IGDA.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGDA.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGDA.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HDEM.L.
HDEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IGDA.L is Global Equities. HDEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HDEM.L and 0.40% for IGDA.L.
Find the right allocation for HDEM.L and IGDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer