HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HDEM.L (Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and EMHD.L (Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Invesco - HDEM.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while EMHD.L tracks the FTSE Emerging High Dividend Low Volatility Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDEM.L returned 8.19%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for EMHD.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) and Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (EMHD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HDEM.L is traded in GBp, while EMHD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMHD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HDEM.L having a 8.36% return and EMHD.L slightly higher at 8.56%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HDEM.L having a 8.19% annualized return and EMHD.L not far behind at 7.93%.

HDEM.L

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: 8.36%
• 6M: 6.78%
• 1Y: 25.44%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 6.83%
• 10Y*: 8.19%

EMHD.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -3.08%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: 6.60%
• 1Y: 25.56%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 6.82%
• 10Y*: 7.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HDEM.L Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF	8.36%	18.32%	3.92%	3.74%	-6.39%	15.10%	-10.00%	11.46%	-1.01%	16.23%
EMHD.L Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist	8.56%	17.89%	4.06%	5.34%	-7.42%	14.77%	-9.59%	10.66%	-0.87%	14.49%

Correlation

The correlation between HDEM.L and EMHD.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2016	0.89

The correlation between HDEM.L and EMHD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HDEM.L	EMHD.L
Financial Services	24.3%	23.6%
Energy	18.3%	18.9%
Industrials	10.6%	10.7%
Utilities	9.9%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	6.7%
Communication Services	6.0%	6.0%
Basic Materials	5.8%	5.7%
Real Estate	4.6%	4.4%
Technology	4.3%	3.2%
Healthcare	1.6%	1.7%

Return for Risk

HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDEM.L

HDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
HDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
HDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
HDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

EMHD.L

EMHD.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
EMHD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
EMHD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
EMHD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EMHD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EMHD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) and Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (EMHD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HDEM.L	EMHD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.12	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	3.07	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.37	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.80	4.39	+0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.83	12.40	+1.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the EMHD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDEM.L and EMHD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HDEM.L	EMHD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.12	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.48	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.48	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.50	+0.05

Drawdowns

HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -32.18%, roughly equal to the maximum EMHD.L drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEM.L and EMHD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDEM.L	EMHD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.18%	-32.35%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.28%	-5.78%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.22%	-12.07%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.05%	-18.33%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.18%	-32.35%	+0.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.70%	-3.87%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.84%	-6.99%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	2.05%	-0.22%

Volatility

HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) is 2.93%, while Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (EMHD.L) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that HDEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMHD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDEM.L	EMHD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	3.57%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.52%	9.04%	-1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.18%	11.95%	-1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.51%	14.16%	-0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.82%	16.69%	-0.87%

HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HDEM.L and EMHD.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

HDEM.L vs. EMHD.L - Dividend Comparison

HDEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, which matches EMHD.L's 4.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EMHD.L Invesco FTSE Emerging Markets High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist	4.89%	5.17%	5.78%	5.99%	9.02%	6.08%	4.02%	5.04%	5.51%	4.92%	2.37%
HDEM.L Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF	4.86%	5.17%	5.62%	6.08%	8.93%	5.96%	4.31%	5.23%	5.37%	6.81%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDEM.L and EMHD.L in my portfolio?

HDEM.L and EMHD.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HDEM.L or EMHD.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HDEM.L or EMHD.L?

HDEM.L and EMHD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

What is the main difference between HDEM.L and EMHD.L?

HDEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while EMHD.L tracks FTSE Emerging High Dividend Low Volatility Net Tax Index.