PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDEM.L vs. DEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDEM.L vs. DEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDEM.L achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than DEM.L's 19.41% return. Over the past 10 years, HDEM.L has underperformed DEM.L with an annualized return of 8.19%, while DEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.


HDEM.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
8.36%
6M
6.78%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
8.19%

DEM.L

1D
0.31%
1M
6.29%
YTD
19.41%
6M
19.10%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDEM.L vs. DEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDEM.L
Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
8.36%18.32%3.92%3.74%-6.39%15.10%-10.00%11.46%-1.01%16.23%
DEM.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF
19.41%12.71%11.70%18.04%-2.59%15.16%-6.66%17.84%-1.94%14.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HDEM.L and DEM.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2016

0.74

The correlation between HDEM.L and DEM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDEM.L vs. DEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDEM.L
DEM.L

Financial Services

24.3%
25.5%

Energy

18.3%
4.8%

Industrials

10.6%
11.7%

Utilities

9.9%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
8.9%

Communication Services

6.0%
5.5%

Basic Materials

5.8%
6.5%

Real Estate

4.6%
5.0%

Technology

4.3%
16.7%

Healthcare

1.6%
2.0%

Financial Services

HDEM.L
24.3%
DEM.L
25.5%

Energy

HDEM.L
18.3%
DEM.L
4.8%

Industrials

HDEM.L
10.6%
DEM.L
11.7%

Utilities

HDEM.L
9.9%
DEM.L
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HDEM.L
7.6%
DEM.L
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

HDEM.L
6.9%
DEM.L
8.9%

Communication Services

HDEM.L
6.0%
DEM.L
5.5%

Basic Materials

HDEM.L
5.8%
DEM.L
6.5%

Real Estate

HDEM.L
4.6%
DEM.L
5.0%

Technology

HDEM.L
4.3%
DEM.L
16.7%

Healthcare

HDEM.L
1.6%
DEM.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDEM.L vs. DEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDEM.L
HDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

DEM.L
DEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDEM.L vs. DEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDEM.LDEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

4.80

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.83

16.63

-2.80

HDEM.L vs. DEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the DEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDEM.L and DEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDEM.LDEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.40

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.97

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.84

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.60

-0.06

Drawdowns

HDEM.L vs. DEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -32.18%, smaller than the maximum DEM.L drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEM.L and DEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDEM.LDEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.18%

-35.94%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.28%

-6.56%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.22%

-12.37%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.05%

-14.48%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.18%

-30.09%

-2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-0.59%

-3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-6.54%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.90%

-0.07%

Volatility

HDEM.L vs. DEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) is 2.93%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that HDEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDEM.LDEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

4.23%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

9.73%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

13.09%

-2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

13.31%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.82%

16.47%

-0.65%

HDEM.L vs. DEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDEM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM.L's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDEM.L vs. DEM.L - Dividend Comparison

HDEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than DEM.L's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF
3.72%4.47%11.82%9.48%7.05%4.14%9.14%6.10%4.19%3.16%1.48%4.55%
HDEM.L
Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
4.86%5.17%5.62%6.08%8.93%5.96%4.31%5.23%5.37%6.81%2.78%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDEM.L and DEM.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DEM.L is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DEM.L is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HDEM.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HDEM.L and 0.46% for DEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDEM.L and DEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer