PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCYIX vs. GOIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCYIX achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly lower than GOIIX's 7.78% return. Over the past 10 years, HCYIX has underperformed GOIIX with an annualized return of 5.61%, while GOIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.75% annualized return.


HCYIX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.56%
YTD
2.59%
6M
2.68%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
8.95%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
5.61%

GOIIX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.82%
YTD
7.78%
6M
8.46%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCYIX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class
2.59%8.62%10.38%7.07%-10.69%15.81%-1.63%15.59%-2.78%8.36%
GOIIX
Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio
7.78%15.03%14.81%15.16%-15.86%12.65%12.73%19.16%-8.63%16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HCYIX and GOIIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.83

The correlation between HCYIX and GOIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCYIX vs. GOIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCYIX
HCYIX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HCYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HCYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GOIIX
GOIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GOIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GOIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCYIXGOIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.87

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

12.67

-4.32

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCYIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the GOIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCYIX and GOIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCYIXGOIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.37

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.72

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.78

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.55

+0.13

Drawdowns

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCYIX drawdown since its inception was -25.70%, smaller than the maximum GOIIX drawdown of -43.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCYIX and GOIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCYIXGOIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.70%

-43.63%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

-7.17%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.73%

-12.19%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.75%

-23.78%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.70%

-25.07%

-0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-6.41%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.62%

-0.37%

Volatility

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX) is 1.32%, while Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that HCYIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCYIXGOIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

2.65%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

6.99%

-2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

8.69%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

10.65%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.09%

11.27%

-3.18%

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCYIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than GOIIX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Dividend Comparison

HCYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, less than GOIIX's 7.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOIIX
Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio
7.96%7.98%9.79%1.97%5.09%6.80%3.47%2.29%3.04%2.73%1.37%3.99%
HCYIX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class
6.64%6.51%3.46%3.05%3.01%2.61%3.36%2.87%4.22%2.75%3.87%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, HCYIX and GOIIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GOIIX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to HCYIX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCYIX dropped -25.70% vs GOIIX's -43.63%.

GOIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCYIX and GOIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer