PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCYIX vs. GOIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCYIX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class
-2.52%8.62%10.38%7.07%-10.69%15.81%-1.63%15.59%-2.78%8.36%
GOIIX
Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio
-3.39%15.03%14.81%15.16%-15.86%12.65%12.73%19.16%-8.63%16.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCYIX achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly higher than GOIIX's -3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, HCYIX has underperformed GOIIX with an annualized return of 5.36%, while GOIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.70% annualized return.


HCYIX

1D
0.06%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
-2.52%
6M
-0.77%
1Y
6.32%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
5.36%

GOIIX

1D
0.07%
1M
-6.83%
YTD
-3.39%
6M
-0.74%
1Y
12.30%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
7.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCYIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than GOIIX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HCYIX vs. GOIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCYIX
HCYIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HCYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HCYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

GOIIX
GOIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GOIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GOIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX) and Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCYIXGOIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

1.21

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

1.61

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

0.98

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.83

4.37

+0.45

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCYIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the GOIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCYIX and GOIIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCYIXGOIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.21

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.60

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.69

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.52

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between HCYIX and GOIIX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Dividend Comparison

HCYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, less than GOIIX's 8.88% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCYIX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class
6.83%6.51%3.46%3.05%3.01%2.61%3.36%2.87%4.22%2.75%3.87%4.54%
GOIIX
Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio
8.88%7.98%9.79%1.97%5.09%6.80%3.47%2.29%3.04%2.73%1.37%3.99%

Drawdowns

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCYIX drawdown since its inception was -25.70%, smaller than the maximum GOIIX drawdown of -43.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCYIX and GOIIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HCYIXGOIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.70%

-43.63%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.21%

-8.55%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.75%

-23.78%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.70%

-25.07%

-0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-7.10%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-6.44%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

2.14%

-0.87%

Volatility

HCYIX vs. GOIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX) is 2.19%, while Goldman Sachs Growth and Income Strategy Portfolio (GOIIX) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that HCYIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HCYIXGOIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

3.77%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

6.48%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.86%

10.40%

-3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.46%

10.58%

-4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.07%

11.22%

-3.15%