HCRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO
HCRE.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF) and ZAG.TO (BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index (Total Return), while ZAG.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HCRE.TO returned 4.08%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ZAG.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HCRE.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZAG.TO.
Performance
HCRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCRE.TO achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than ZAG.TO's 1.70% return.
HCRE.TO
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 13.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- —
ZAG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
HCRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCRE.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF | 9.90% | 12.54% | 3.71% | 0.93% | -17.12% | 33.69% | -6.72% | 18.00% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.70% | 2.25% | 4.48% | 6.41% | -11.60% | -2.60% | 8.34% | 6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCRE.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019 | 0.15 |
HCRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HCRE.TO
ZAG.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HCRE.TO
ZAG.TO
Basic Materials
HCRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Communication Services
HCRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HCRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HCRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Energy
HCRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Financial Services
HCRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Healthcare
HCRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Industrials
HCRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Technology
HCRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Utilities
HCRE.TO
-
ZAG.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HCRE.TO
ZAG.TO
HCRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF (HCRE.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCRE.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.17 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 2.73 | +2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCRE.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.73 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.12 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.45 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
HCRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.39%, which is greater than ZAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCRE.TO and ZAG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCRE.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.39% | -18.03% | -25.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -2.79% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -5.42% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.87% | -15.77% | -17.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -1.09% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -3.54% | -8.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 1.19% | +1.57% |
Volatility
HCRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF (HCRE.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) at 1.68%. This indicates that HCRE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCRE.TO | ZAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 1.68% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 3.43% | +5.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.95% | 4.46% | +7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 6.58% | +11.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 7.11% | +14.51% |
HCRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCRE.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAG.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison
HCRE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCRE.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.42% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 3.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCRE.TO and ZAG.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZAG.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZAG.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HCRE.TO.
HCRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while ZAG.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. HCRE.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index (Total Return), while ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HCRE.TO and 0.09% for ZAG.TO.
Find the right allocation for HCRE.TO and ZAG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer