HCRB vs. PCRB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB).

HCRB and PCRB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HCRB is an actively managed fund by Hartford. It was launched on Feb 19, 2020. PCRB is an actively managed fund by Putnam. It was launched on Jan 19, 2023.

Performance

HCRB vs. PCRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HCRB vs. PCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HCRB Hartford Core Bond ETF	-0.11%	7.06%	2.23%	3.36%
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -	0.33%	7.21%	1.91%	2.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCRB achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than PCRB's 0.33% return.

HCRB

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: 0.86%
• 1Y: 4.04%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: 0.24%
• 10Y*: —

PCRB

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: 4.65%
• 3Y*: 3.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCRB vs. PCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCRB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PCRB's 0.35% expense ratio.

PCRB

Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -

HCRB

Hartford Core Bond ETF

Return for Risk

HCRB vs. PCRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCRB

HCRB Risk / Return Rank: 51
HCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
HCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 42
HCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
HCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

PCRB

PCRB Risk / Return Rank: 61
PCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCRB vs. PCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HCRB	PCRB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	1.09	-0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	1.58	-0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.19	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	2.06	-0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.55	5.79	-1.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HCRB vs. PCRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCRB Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the PCRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCRB and PCRB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HCRB	PCRB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	1.09	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.65	-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between HCRB and PCRB is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HCRB vs. PCRB - Dividend Comparison

HCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than PCRB's 9.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HCRB Hartford Core Bond ETF	4.23%	4.12%	4.15%	3.39%	2.18%	1.47%	1.81%
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -	9.42%	4.30%	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HCRB vs. PCRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCRB drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, which is greater than PCRB's maximum drawdown of -7.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCRB and PCRB.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCRB	PCRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.90%	-7.20%	-12.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.68%	-2.42%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-1.54%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-1.64%	-5.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	0.86%	+0.08%

Volatility

HCRB vs. PCRB - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) at 1.56%. This indicates that HCRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCRB	PCRB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	1.56%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.59%	2.49%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31%	4.28%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.12%	5.71%	+0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.01%	5.71%	+0.30%