HCON.TO vs. HSAV.TO
HCON.TO (Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF) and HSAV.TO (Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCON.TO is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Global X, while HSAV.TO is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HCON.TO returned 5.15%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for HSAV.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. HCON.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for HSAV.TO.
Performance
HCON.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCON.TO achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than HSAV.TO's 1.04% return.
HCON.TO
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- 10.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- —
HSAV.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- —
HCON.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCON.TO Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF | 5.14% | 10.11% | 12.67% | 11.86% | -16.79% | 9.57% | 10.27% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 1.04% | 2.58% | 4.24% | 5.04% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCON.TO and HSAV.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2020 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCON.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HCON.TO
HSAV.TO
HCON.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF (HCON.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCON.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 4.58 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.89 | 12.46 | -1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCON.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.96 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.82 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.72 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
HCON.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCON.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.98%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCON.TO and HSAV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCON.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.98% | -2.18% | -20.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -0.59% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.10% | -1.06% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.12% | -2.18% | -17.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.18% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.32% | -0.19% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 0.22% | +1.01% |
Volatility
HCON.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF (HCON.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.48%. This indicates that HCON.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCON.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 0.48% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.36% | 1.05% | +4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.69% | 1.39% | +5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.71% | 1.77% | +6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 1.58% | +10.04% |
HCON.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCON.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAV.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HCON.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison
HCON.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, while HSAV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCON.TO Global X Conservative Asset Allocation ETF | 2.73% | 2.83% | 2.60% | 1.19% | 0.02% | 0.09% | 0.79% | 0.04% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCON.TO and HSAV.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSAV.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSAV.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for HCON.TO.
HCON.TO is categorized as Global Allocation, while HSAV.TO is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for HCON.TO and 0.18% for HSAV.TO.
Find the right allocation for HCON.TO and HSAV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer