HCAYX vs. FLCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund (HCAYX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX).
HCAYX is managed by Hartford. It was launched on Jul 22, 1996. FLCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 2, 2016.
Performance
HCAYX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HCAYX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCAYX The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund | -8.42% | 10.66% | 20.31% | 19.24% | -17.64% | 15.56% | 21.14% | 35.95% | -4.83% | 21.82% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | -7.05% | 17.84% | 25.08% | 26.25% | -18.06% | 28.61% | 18.24% | 31.59% | -4.38% | 21.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCAYX achieves a -8.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's -7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, HCAYX has underperformed FLCPX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while FLCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.
HCAYX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- -8.42%
- 6M
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- 8.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
FLCPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HCAYX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCAYX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HCAYX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank
HCAYX
FLCPX
HCAYX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund (HCAYX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCAYX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 0.84 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.82 | 1.30 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.20 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 1.00 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.39 | 4.86 | -2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCAYX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 0.84 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.67 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.76 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.82 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between HCAYX and FLCPX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HCAYX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison
HCAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, more than FLCPX's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCAYX The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund | 6.01% | 5.50% | 7.89% | 0.41% | 4.97% | 13.12% | 4.31% | 7.95% | 16.29% | 13.10% | 0.73% | 8.62% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 0.60% | 0.56% | 6.11% | 7.05% | 11.23% | 10.38% | 3.93% | 1.74% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HCAYX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCAYX drawdown since its inception was -59.00%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCAYX and FLCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCAYX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.00% | -33.87% | -25.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.02% | -12.14% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.48% | -24.40% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.31% | -33.87% | -2.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.10% | -8.89% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.43% | -4.24% | -6.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.56% | +0.22% |
Volatility
HCAYX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison
The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund (HCAYX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) at 4.24%. This indicates that HCAYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HCAYX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 4.24% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 9.09% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 18.14% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 17.03% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 18.12% | -0.11% |