HCAN.L vs. XDEV.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HCAN.L (HSBC MSCI Canada UCITS ETF) and XDEV.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - HCAN.L tracks the HSBC MSCI Canada UCITS ETF while XDEV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HCAN.L returned 10.39%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for XDEV.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HCAN.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEV.L.

Performance

HCAN.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (HCAN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCAN.L achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.L's 29.58% return. Over the past 10 years, HCAN.L has underperformed XDEV.L with an annualized return of 10.39%, while XDEV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.

HCAN.L

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 7.92%
• YTD: 9.55%
• 1Y: 29.38%
• 3Y*: 20.05%
• 5Y*: 12.91%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

XDEV.L

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: -4.46%
• 6M: 25.56%
• YTD: 29.58%
• 1Y: 56.03%
• 3Y*: 25.49%
• 5Y*: 17.13%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCAN.L vs. XDEV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HCAN.L HSBC MSCI Canada UCITS ETF	9.55%	27.77%	13.87%	8.86%	-1.98%	25.93%	2.24%	21.12%	-14.36%	4.17%
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C	29.58%	30.51%	6.79%	13.25%	1.01%	21.67%	-6.88%	14.56%	-9.23%	11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HCAN.L and XDEV.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2014	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between HCAN.L and XDEV.L has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HCAN.L vs. XDEV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCAN.L

HCAN.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
HCAN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
HCAN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
HCAN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
HCAN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
HCAN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

XDEV.L

XDEV.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XDEV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
XDEV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
XDEV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
XDEV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCAN.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (HCAN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HCAN.L	XDEV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	3.72	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	4.95	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.68	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.22	8.06	-3.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.91	26.50	-9.59

HCAN.L vs. XDEV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCAN.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCAN.L and XDEV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HCAN.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCAN.L drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.L drawdown of -45.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCAN.L and XDEV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCAN.L	XDEV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.05%	-45.89%	+11.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.11%	-6.92%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.21%	-19.90%	+5.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.21%	-19.90%	+5.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.72%	-35.20%	+1.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-5.91%	+5.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.37%	-15.27%	+7.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	2.11%	-0.33%

Volatility

HCAN.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Canada UCITS ETF (HCAN.L) is 3.25%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that HCAN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCAN.L	XDEV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	6.07%	-2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	13.08%	-5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.28%	15.01%	-3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.26%	19.12%	-4.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.98%	21.02%	-5.04%

HCAN.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCAN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

HCAN.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison

HCAN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while XDEV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HCAN.L HSBC MSCI Canada UCITS ETF	1.39%	1.55%	1.97%	2.14%	1.90%	1.53%	1.93%	1.04%	0.00%	0.81%	1.60%	2.17%
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCAN.L and XDEV.L in my portfolio?

HCAN.L and XDEV.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HCAN.L or XDEV.L?

On fees, XDEV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HCAN.L or XDEV.L?

XDEV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HCAN.L.

What is the main difference between HCAN.L and XDEV.L?

HCAN.L tracks HSBC MSCI Canada UCITS ETF, while XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HCAN.L and 0.25% for XDEV.L.