HCAL.TO vs. ZWB.TO
HCAL.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF) and ZWB.TO (BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCAL.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index (125%), while ZWB.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BMO. HCAL.TO is passively managed, while ZWB.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HCAL.TO returned 20.76%/yr vs 13.82%/yr for ZWB.TO. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HCAL.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for ZWB.TO.
Performance
HCAL.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCAL.TO achieves a 23.54% return, which is significantly higher than ZWB.TO's 16.23% return.
HCAL.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 23.54%
- 6M
- 30.66%
- 1Y
- 76.99%
- 3Y*
- 39.62%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ZWB.TO
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 6M
- 21.03%
- 1Y
- 49.97%
- 3Y*
- 25.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
HCAL.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCAL.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF | 23.54% | 54.09% | 29.04% | 11.73% | -17.53% | 51.61% | 16.06% |
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF | 16.23% | 34.91% | 19.41% | 6.67% | -11.00% | 30.81% | 11.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCAL.TO and ZWB.TO is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between HCAL.TO and ZWB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
HCAL.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HCAL.TO
ZWB.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
HCAL.TO
ZWB.TO
Basic Materials
HCAL.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Communication Services
HCAL.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HCAL.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HCAL.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Energy
HCAL.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Healthcare
HCAL.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Industrials
HCAL.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Real Estate
HCAL.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Technology
HCAL.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Utilities
HCAL.TO
-
ZWB.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCAL.TO vs. ZWB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HCAL.TO
ZWB.TO
HCAL.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCAL.TO | ZWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.89 | 4.44 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.36 | 6.16 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.88 | 1.86 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.26 | 6.42 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.55 | 28.83 | +2.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCAL.TO | ZWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.89 | 4.44 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 1.10 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 0.74 | +0.90 |
Drawdowns
HCAL.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, smaller than the maximum ZWB.TO drawdown of -39.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCAL.TO and ZWB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCAL.TO | ZWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.05% | -39.36% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.65% | -7.82% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -14.05% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -25.26% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -1.85% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -5.56% | -4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 1.74% | +0.71% |
Volatility
HCAL.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) at 4.26%. This indicates that HCAL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCAL.TO | ZWB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 4.26% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.08% | 10.03% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.82% | 11.31% | +4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 12.63% | +4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 15.68% | +1.32% |
HCAL.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCAL.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ZWB.TO's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCAL.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Dividend Comparison
HCAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than ZWB.TO's 5.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCAL.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF | 3.49% | 4.20% | 6.12% | 7.37% | 7.47% | 4.99% | 3.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWB.TO BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF | 5.02% | 5.38% | 6.66% | 7.62% | 7.30% | 5.46% | 5.80% | 5.53% | 5.59% | 4.80% | 5.04% | 5.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, HCAL.TO and ZWB.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, HCAL.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HCAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for ZWB.TO.
HCAL.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ZWB.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HCAL.TO and 0.71% for ZWB.TO.
Find the right allocation for HCAL.TO and ZWB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer