HCAL.TO vs. QQU.TO
HCAL.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF) and QQU.TO (BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCAL.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index (125%), while QQU.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HCAL.TO returned 20.80%/yr vs 23.89%/yr for QQU.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HCAL.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for QQU.TO.
Performance
HCAL.TO vs. QQU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCAL.TO achieves a 24.08% return, which is significantly lower than QQU.TO's 41.30% return.
HCAL.TO
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 24.08%
- 6M
- 31.04%
- 1Y
- 78.37%
- 3Y*
- 39.82%
- 5Y*
- 20.80%
- 10Y*
- —
QQU.TO
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 21.53%
- YTD
- 41.30%
- 6M
- 36.89%
- 1Y
- 84.16%
- 3Y*
- 46.99%
- 5Y*
- 23.89%
- 10Y*
- 33.31%
HCAL.TO vs. QQU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCAL.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF | 24.08% | 54.09% | 29.04% | 11.73% | -17.53% | 51.61% | 16.06% |
QQU.TO BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF | 41.30% | 26.77% | 40.01% | 114.00% | -61.73% | 52.20% | 15.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCAL.TO and QQU.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020 | 0.45 |
The correlation between HCAL.TO and QQU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
HCAL.TO vs. QQU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HCAL.TO
QQU.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
HCAL.TO
QQU.TO
Basic Materials
HCAL.TO
-
QQU.TO
Communication Services
HCAL.TO
-
QQU.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HCAL.TO
-
QQU.TO
Consumer Defensive
HCAL.TO
-
QQU.TO
Energy
HCAL.TO
-
QQU.TO
Healthcare
HCAL.TO
-
QQU.TO
Industrials
HCAL.TO
-
QQU.TO
Real Estate
HCAL.TO
-
QQU.TO
Technology
HCAL.TO
-
QQU.TO
Utilities
HCAL.TO
-
QQU.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCAL.TO vs. QQU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HCAL.TO
QQU.TO
HCAL.TO vs. QQU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO) and BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCAL.TO | QQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.98 | 2.67 | +2.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.45 | 3.13 | +3.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.41 | +0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.32 | 3.36 | +3.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.93 | 11.54 | +20.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCAL.TO | QQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98 | 2.67 | +2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 0.54 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.65 | 0.56 | +1.10 |
Drawdowns
HCAL.TO vs. QQU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, smaller than the maximum QQU.TO drawdown of -78.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCAL.TO and QQU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCAL.TO | QQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.05% | -78.51% | +43.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.65% | -25.85% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -43.00% | +24.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -64.83% | +29.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | 0.00% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -17.03% | +7.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 7.54% | -5.10% |
Volatility
HCAL.TO vs. QQU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO) is 6.30%, while BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that HCAL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCAL.TO | QQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 9.22% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.13% | 24.33% | -10.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.82% | 31.71% | -15.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 44.87% | -27.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 44.87% | -27.86% |
HCAL.TO vs. QQU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCAL.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QQU.TO's 1.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCAL.TO vs. QQU.TO - Dividend Comparison
HCAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while QQU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCAL.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF | 3.47% | 4.20% | 6.12% | 7.37% | 7.47% | 4.99% | 3.14% |
QQU.TO BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCAL.TO and QQU.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HCAL.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HCAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QQU.TO.
HCAL.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQU.TO is Nasdaq-100. HCAL.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index (125%), while QQU.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HCAL.TO and 1.46% for QQU.TO.
Find the right allocation for HCAL.TO and QQU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer