HCA.TO vs. HHIS.TO
HCA.TO (Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF) and HHIS.TO (Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCA.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index, while HHIS.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. HCA.TO is passively managed, while HHIS.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, HCA.TO returned 71.89% vs 27.04% for HHIS.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HCA.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for HHIS.TO.
Performance
HCA.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCA.TO achieves a 27.33% return, which is significantly higher than HHIS.TO's 4.23% return.
HCA.TO
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 10.26%
- YTD
- 27.33%
- 6M
- 28.07%
- 1Y
- 71.89%
- 3Y*
- 34.65%
- 5Y*
- 19.13%
- 10Y*
- —
HHIS.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCA.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HCA.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF | 27.33% | 44.97% |
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 4.23% | 24.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCA.TO and HHIS.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCA.TO vs. HHIS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HCA.TO
HHIS.TO
HCA.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF (HCA.TO) and Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HCA.TO | HHIS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.09 | 1.20 | +0.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.41 | 1.08 | +7.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.16 | 2.68 | +35.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HCA.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCA.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.89%, which is greater than HHIS.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCA.TO and HHIS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCA.TO | HHIS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.89% | -31.83% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -24.43% | +15.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.47% | +7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -8.64% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 9.86% | -7.99% |
Volatility
HCA.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF (HCA.TO) is 3.29%, while Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that HCA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HHIS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCA.TO | HHIS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 8.04% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 18.09% | -6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.07% | 23.84% | -10.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 33.81% | -19.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 33.81% | -10.93% |
HCA.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCA.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HHIS.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCA.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Dividend Comparison
HCA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than HHIS.TO's 27.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCA.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF | 2.74% | 3.44% | 4.83% | 8.98% | 5.45% | 4.17% | 3.54% |
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 27.93% | 22.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCA.TO and HHIS.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HCA.TO.
HCA.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while HHIS.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HCA.TO and 0.00% for HHIS.TO.
Find the right allocation for HCA.TO and HHIS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer