PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBTA vs. SPIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBTA vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTA achieves a 14.07% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 2.91% return.


HBTA

1D
-0.68%
1M
7.20%
YTD
14.07%
6M
14.43%
1Y
38.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPIN

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.52%
YTD
2.91%
6M
3.47%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTA vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HBTA and SPIN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.89

The correlation between HBTA and SPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBTA vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTA
HBTA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTA vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBTASPINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.02

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.75

8.42

+5.33

HBTA vs. SPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the SPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBTA and SPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBTASPINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.89

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.95

-0.04

Drawdowns

HBTA vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTA drawdown since its inception was -26.73%, which is greater than SPIN's maximum drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTA and SPIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBTASPINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.73%

-16.85%

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-9.81%

-3.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.40%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-2.29%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.35%

+0.45%

Volatility

HBTA vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) at 1.82%. This indicates that HBTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBTASPINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

1.82%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

8.03%

+5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.18%

10.49%

+6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.85%

14.33%

+10.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

14.33%

+10.52%

HBTA vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBTA vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison

HBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than SPIN's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HBTA
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
0.56%0.64%0.00%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
5.64%8.20%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBTA and SPIN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HBTA has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to SPIN (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTA dropped -26.73% vs SPIN's -16.85%.

On 1-year performance, HBTA leads with 38.33% vs 19.71% for SPIN. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HBTA has performed better with a 38.33% return vs 19.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HBTA.

SPIN has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.56% for HBTA.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HBTA and 0.25% for SPIN.

HBTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBTA and SPIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer