HBTA vs. GPIX
HBTA (Horizon Expedition Plus ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBTA returned 38.33% vs 25.55% for GPIX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HBTA charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.
Performance
HBTA vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBTA achieves a 14.07% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 9.91% return.
HBTA
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 38.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBTA vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF | 14.07% | 14.69% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 9.91% | 12.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBTA and GPIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.94 |
The correlation between HBTA and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBTA vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
HBTA
GPIX
HBTA vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBTA | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.48 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.33 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.75 | 16.77 | -3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBTA | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.52 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.78 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
HBTA vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBTA drawdown since its inception was -26.73%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTA and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBTA | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.73% | -17.50% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | -7.71% | -5.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.48% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -1.48% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.53% | +1.27% |
Volatility
HBTA vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 2.26%. This indicates that HBTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBTA | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 2.26% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 7.89% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 10.17% | +7.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 13.80% | +11.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 13.80% | +11.05% |
HBTA vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBTA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBTA vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
HBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than GPIX's 8.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.00% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% |
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF | 0.56% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, HBTA and GPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HBTA has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to GPIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTA dropped -26.73% vs GPIX's -17.50%.
On 1-year performance, HBTA leads with 38.33% vs 25.55% for GPIX. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HBTA has performed better with a 38.33% return vs 25.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HBTA.
GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 0.56% for HBTA.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HBTA and 0.29% for GPIX.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HBTA and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer