PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBTA vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBTA vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTA achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 9.57% return.


HBTA

1D
-2.31%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
10.13%
6M
8.98%
1Y
31.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOY

1D
-0.99%
1M
-8.62%
YTD
9.57%
6M
9.10%
1Y
83.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTA vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HBTA and GOOY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.62

The correlation between HBTA and GOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBTA vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTA
HBTA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTA vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HBTAGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.60

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

5.17

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

18.36

-7.43

HBTA vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBTA and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HBTA vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTA drawdown since its inception was -26.73%, which is greater than GOOY's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTA and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBTAGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.73%

-24.40%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-16.15%

+2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.10%

-11.86%

+7.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-6.28%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

4.54%

-1.63%

Volatility

HBTA vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) is 7.25%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that HBTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBTAGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.25%

8.16%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.61%

17.72%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

23.67%

-5.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

23.43%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.04%

23.43%

+1.61%

HBTA vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBTA vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

HBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than GOOY's 52.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
52.71%41.50%36.74%7.90%
HBTA
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
0.58%0.64%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBTA and GOOY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOY has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to HBTA (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTA dropped -26.73% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 83.00% vs 31.71% for HBTA. On fees, HBTA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, HBTA has been the lower-risk option at 7.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 83.00% return vs 31.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HBTA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 52.71%, compared with 0.58% for HBTA.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HBTA and 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBTA and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer