HBTA vs. CWII

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HBTA (Horizon Expedition Plus ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBTA charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.

Performance

HBTA vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTA achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 13,199.78% return.

HBTA

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 31.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CWII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10,273.16%
• YTD: 13,199.78%
• 6M: 11,946.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTA vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF	10.13%	-0.93%
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	13,199.78%	-45.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HBTA and CWII is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

HBTA vs. CWII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTA

HBTA Risk / Return Rank: 57
HBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
HBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
HBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
HBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
HBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

CWII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTA vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBTA	CWII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.93	—	—

Drawdowns

HBTA vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTA drawdown since its inception was -26.73%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTA and CWII.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBTA	CWII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.73%	-51.04%	+24.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.10%	0.00%	-4.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-33.26%	+29.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HBTA	CWII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.28%	13,701.30%	-13,683.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.04%	13,701.30%	-13,676.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.04%	13,701.30%	-13,676.26%

HBTA vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBTA vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

HBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than CWII's 123.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	123.26%	6.09%
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF	0.58%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBTA and CWII in my portfolio?

HBTA and CWII have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HBTA or CWII?

On fees, HBTA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBTA or CWII?

HBTA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HBTA or CWII?

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 0.58% for HBTA.

What is the main difference between HBTA and CWII?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HBTA and 1.03% for CWII.