HBKU.L vs. MINT.L
HBKU.L ([](/symbol/HBKU.L)) and MINT.L (PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past year, HBKU.L returned 4.26% vs 4.58% for MINT.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HBKU.L vs. MINT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBKU.L achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than MINT.L's 2.39% return.
HBKU.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MINT.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
HBKU.L vs. MINT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HBKU.L | 0.37% | 7.38% | 2.88% | 4.00% |
MINT.L PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF | 2.39% | 4.66% | 5.75% | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBKU.L and MINT.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBKU.L vs. MINT.L — Risk / Return Rank
HBKU.L
MINT.L
HBKU.L vs. MINT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for (HBKU.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBKU.L | MINT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -15.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 3.57 | -2.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 45.35 | -44.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | 232.26 | -228.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBKU.L vs. MINT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBKU.L drawdown since its inception was -3.43%, smaller than the maximum MINT.L drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBKU.L and MINT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBKU.L | MINT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.43% | -3.89% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -0.10% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -3.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | 0.00% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -0.23% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 0.02% | +1.08% |
Volatility
HBKU.L vs. MINT.L - Volatility Comparison
(HBKU.L) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) at 0.14%. This indicates that HBKU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBKU.L | MINT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.14% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.63% | 0.35% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 0.58% | +3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 0.76% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.63% | 0.95% | +2.68% |
Dividends
HBKU.L vs. MINT.L - Dividend Comparison
HBKU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBKU.L | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT.L PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF | 4.36% | 4.43% | 5.18% | 4.81% | 1.51% | 0.34% | 1.17% | 2.63% | 2.33% | 1.56% | 1.31% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBKU.L and MINT.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: ETF Issuer and PIMCO.
Find the right allocation for HBKU.L and MINT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer