PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBKU.L vs. HMUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBKU.L vs. HMUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HBKU.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HBKU.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.35%
6M
0.17%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HMUD.L

1D
0.16%
1M
0.65%
6M
8.17%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
14.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBKU.L vs. HMUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HBKU.L
HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%7.38%2.88%4.00%
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
10.05%13.89%25.05%7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HBKU.L and HMUD.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBKU.L vs. HMUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBKU.L
HBKU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HBKU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBKU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBKU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HBKU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBKU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

HMUD.L
HMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBKU.L vs. HMUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HBKU.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HBKU.LHMUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.46

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.50

10.77

-7.27

HBKU.L vs. HMUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBKU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBKU.L and HMUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HBKU.L vs. HMUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBKU.L drawdown since its inception was -3.43%, smaller than the maximum HMUD.L drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBKU.L and HMUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBKU.LHMUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-34.31%

+30.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-8.29%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-0.31%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-3.94%

+3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.89%

-0.78%

Volatility

HBKU.L vs. HMUD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HBKU.L) is 0.75%, while HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that HBKU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBKU.LHMUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

3.46%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.62%

8.83%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.03%

11.48%

-7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.62%

16.18%

-12.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

16.29%

-12.67%

HBKU.L vs. HMUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBKU.L has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than HMUD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBKU.L vs. HMUD.L - Dividend Comparison

HBKU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBKU.L
HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.90%0.95%0.82%0.97%1.07%0.78%1.11%1.22%1.45%1.24%1.43%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBKU.L and HMUD.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMUD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMUD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HBKU.L.

HBKU.L is categorized as Global Sukuk, while HMUD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. HBKU.L tracks FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index, while HMUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for HBKU.L and 0.30% for HMUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBKU.L and HMUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer