HBKU.L vs. G500.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HBKU.L ([](/symbol/HBKU.L)) and G500.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past year, HBKU.L returned 4.26% vs 22.54% for G500.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HBKU.L vs. G500.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in (HBKU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HBKU.L is traded in USD, while G500.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the G500.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBKU.L achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than G500.L's 10.60% return.

HBKU.L

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: 0.63%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

G500.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.92%
• 6M: 10.32%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBKU.L vs. G500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HBKU.L	0.37%	7.38%	2.88%	4.00%
G500.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)	10.60%	26.32%	22.89%	8.78%

Correlation

The correlation between HBKU.L and G500.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023	0.22

Return for Risk

HBKU.L vs. G500.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBKU.L

HBKU.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
HBKU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
HBKU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
HBKU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
HBKU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
HBKU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

G500.L

G500.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
G500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
G500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
G500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
G500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
G500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBKU.L vs. G500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for (HBKU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBKU.L	G500.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.53	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	2.30	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.27	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	1.82	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.86	6.85	-2.99

HBKU.L vs. G500.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBKU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the G500.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBKU.L and G500.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HBKU.L vs. G500.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBKU.L drawdown since its inception was -3.43%, smaller than the maximum G500.L drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBKU.L and G500.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBKU.L	G500.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.43%	-39.54%	+36.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.43%	-12.56%	+9.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-0.10%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.75%	-8.08%	+7.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	3.34%	-2.24%

Volatility

HBKU.L vs. G500.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for (HBKU.L) is 0.85%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that HBKU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G500.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBKU.L	G500.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	3.57%	-2.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.63%	11.66%	-8.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.04%	14.98%	-10.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.63%	20.37%	-16.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.63%	20.09%	-16.46%

Dividends

HBKU.L vs. G500.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HBKU.L nor G500.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBKU.L and G500.L in my portfolio?

HBKU.L and G500.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between HBKU.L and G500.L?

They also come from different issuers: ETF Issuer and Invesco.