PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBKS.L vs. XG7S.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBKS.L vs. XG7S.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HBKS.L is traded in GBP, while XG7S.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XG7S.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


HBKS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XG7S.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.20%
YTD
-1.01%
6M
-1.39%
1Y
1.54%
3Y*
-0.71%
5Y*
-2.32%
10Y*
0.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBKS.L vs. XG7S.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBKS.L

XG7S.L
XG7S.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XG7S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XG7S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XG7S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XG7S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XG7S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBKS.L vs. XG7S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HBKS.L vs. XG7S.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBKS.LXG7S.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

Drawdowns

HBKS.L vs. XG7S.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBKS.LXG7S.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.78%

Volatility

HBKS.L vs. XG7S.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBKS.LXG7S.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.37%

HBKS.L vs. XG7S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBKS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XG7S.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBKS.L vs. XG7S.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HBKS.L nor XG7S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XG7S.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XG7S.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBKS.L.

HBKS.L tracks FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index, while XG7S.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBKS.L and 0.20% for XG7S.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBKS.L and XG7S.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer