PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) and Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HBKS.L is traded in GBP, while AGHG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AGHG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


HBKS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGHG.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.53%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBKS.L

AGHG.L
AGHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) and Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBKS.LAGHG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

Drawdowns

HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBKS.LAGHG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

Volatility

HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBKS.LAGHG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBKS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AGHG.L's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Dividend Comparison

HBKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
2.98%2.98%2.77%2.55%2.18%0.38%
HBKS.L
HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, AGHG.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGHG.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBKS.L.

HBKS.L tracks FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index, while AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBKS.L and 0.08% for AGHG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBKS.L and AGHG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer