HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L
HBKS.L (HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD) and AGHG.L (Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)) are both Global Bonds funds - HBKS.L tracks the FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index while AGHG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Both are passively managed. HBKS.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for AGHG.L.
Performance
HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HBKS.L is traded in GBP, while AGHG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AGHG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
HBKS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGHG.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L — Risk / Return Rank
HBKS.L
AGHG.L
HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) and Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBKS.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.02 | — |
Drawdowns
HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBKS.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -15.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.08% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.37% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.78% | — |
Volatility
HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBKS.L | AGHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.82% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 4.14% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 4.14% | — |
HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBKS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AGHG.L's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBKS.L vs. AGHG.L - Dividend Comparison
HBKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) | 2.98% | 2.98% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.18% | 0.38% |
HBKS.L HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AGHG.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGHG.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBKS.L.
HBKS.L tracks FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index, while AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBKS.L and 0.08% for AGHG.L.
Find the right allocation for HBKS.L and AGHG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer